Wow, a lot has happened on this thread since I looked this morning. I had a few meetings and 2 employee reviews to do (aka bullying people).
Slinger wrote:
I have no idea McSneek it was sent to me by a friend of mine and it was'nt disclosed
I’d like to be clear that I’m not giving you a hard time for posting the photo of the fish. Some may have seen it that way but it’s not the case. Is the fish big? Sure. Is it a pretty fish? Absolutely. What I find strange is that several people know this fish / have caught this fish. Nobody has disputed my claim that this is a stocked / pet fish from the Becks property / Homewaters / Beaver and the evil empire. Is anybody willing to confirm or deny the origin of the fish?
Brown71 wrote:
I did post 2 or 3 large fish on this board and this board only just for the sake of ending the 30" plus debate.
If I remember correctly, the 30” thread was questioning the existence of wild, river / stream dwelling fish. A specific exclusion was given to lake run fish. You’ve confirmed that your fish ran out of a lake. A lake that should have a tailwater fishery but that’s a topic for a different thread.
McSneek wrote:
Sorry for not buying it at my local fly shop but the hipster was working the day I realized I needed some.
Quality response. I love it.
Boosted3 wrote:
Devaluing someone's catch in a public forum due to a set of limits you set for yourself is sort of pathetic! Just being able to land a fish of this magnitude is a huge challenge in itself. You should be ashamed of yourself for suggesting otherwise. You are just another typical keyboard bully moving from post to post putting your negative touch on things. You are one of those people that give fly fishermen a bad name.
Devaluing the catch? Yes and no. IF the fish is stocked from a private fishery, yeah, I am. I think many on here would feel catching a wild 20” brown or a wild 12” brook trout is a much greater feat than catching a 28” stocker. If you don’t feel that way, great. The last time I checked, I live in #Murica where I’m allowed to have my own opinion. As for being ashamed of myself, nah. No reason to be. I’m actually pretty happy with what I’ve given to the sport by helping new anglers, exchanging methods with seasoned guys, helping others learn the sport and helping people experience new waters. “Keyboard bully moving from post to post putting your negative touch on things. You are one of those people that give fly fishing a bad name.”. I wish I could tell you that the quoted sentence made me do some real soul searching but it didn’t. I did find it amusing though. Thank you for the compliment. “Just landing a fish of this magnitude is a huge challenge in itself”. This statement may or may not be accurate. I’ve caught 16” wild fish that were way harder to fight than others that were over 22”+. The difficulty is often determined by the water in which the fish is hooked…..filled with brush, undercut banks, swift currents, etc. This “feat” is often magnified by lack of experience fighting a bigger fish and it appears that the photographed angler(s) have caught plenty.
I enjoy catching fish and prefer to catch bigger fish. A majority of fish I chase happen to be wild. I do occasionally fish for stocked fish but not that often. I also will photograph some of the fish caught but many aren’t photo and released immediately. If the camera isn’t ready as the fish hits the net…..no pic. I owe a quick and unharmed release to the critters I’m chasing after.