Elite.
Requires an achievement of knowledge and experience that results in the ability to understand and demonstrate and explain the skills and techniques that provide success in the pursuit of pleasure.
Like a head football coach with superior skills and knowledge of the game, compared to the rest of the team and sideline fans.
A football coach with a history of creating winning teams. Better than the other coaches.
An elite for the sport.
Like a race car driver providing knowledge to fans and pit crew. One of the most winning race car drivers.
Requires an "elite".
Being considered an "elite" requires a broad range of knowledge and experience.
But comparisons being made within a realm of jealousy because someone else might have greater skills and knowledge ... those comparisons should remain personal, not public.
Not demeaning.
There's absolutely no place for growing into knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) by adopting an attitude that someone who does have superior KSAs is a bad thing!
Learn. Every era, every activity has elites.
Recognize. Respect, but please don't ridicule and talk down.
(Unless they are jerks.)
Elites don't normally refer to themselves as superior as a human being. Just that they are superior practitioners in a specialty, with enough and a very broad range of experience and education that exceeds the general population.
IMO, "Elites" are usually considered to be so by people who recognize WITHIN THEMSELVES a lack of KSAs.
Nothing bad about being considered an "elite".
But some who have yet to achieve the same KSAs as "elites" seem to feel a strong need to ridicule those who actually do possess greater KSAs, and who are more likely to socialize amongst themselves.
Why?
Because the "elites" can talk without having to explain constantly. It's easier and provides a better feeling for the group to gather and communicate.
Hopefully, the use of the word can be as a noun and/or an adjective of respect, or acknowledgement for those with superior KSAs.
- Like a specialist surgeon with a specialist practice with clients from around the world. And that specialist surgeon socializes within a very limited group of other high-demand surgeons.
- Like Einstein and his/our group of physicists.
I urge that the general use of the word "elite" with flyfishing not be used negatively.
Please do not use the word to redirect out of some personal recognition and frustration of failure to have achieve that level.
Those considered "elites" may have written books. May have taught classes. May have performed and taught many casting techniques to many audiences.
They may make a living by doing so.
They may have their own relationships, based upon mutual knowledge and respect for each other's works and achievements.
Yes. They are "elites", but it's not them who say so.
I've never seen a true flyfishing "elite" wear a T-shirt that states "I'm Elite".
Been running around in my head now and then about "elite".
And I now think that I should acknowledge the existence of those who consider themselves superior, and use their "elitism" to dismiss others.
Happened to me in high school. I was in academic curriculum and also a top athlete. And I hunted, trapped and fished and practice casting year-round - in the snow, etc.
I did all that stuff on my own. Alone.
I earned it for myself.
Not for competition, except when fun, as in games.
Not to show off.
I wouldn't begin to think that anyone thought I was doing any of it in some sort of competition for superiority as a person!
Superiority in a competitive sport. That's the goal of competitive sports.
But here's a story of the first time "elitism", as I feel is referred to at the core of this post, struck me.
And struck me hard.
One of the other academic classmates, who also played football (but sat on the bench) in the midget league, approached me and told me that I wasn't one of them. The true academics.
Which bothered me, because it belittled himself in my eyes, and I had known him since elementary school.
But it also hurt because he pretty much informed me that I wasn't up to par for the "elites".
My other classmates didn't act that way at all. For the most part.
But he was a C student and didn't want me getting any attention of dignity in the academic class.
He seemed to need to do that.
For his own self-respect and image.
But I wasn't social group joiner, for the most part.
I fished alone from age 5. I fished with every reel and rod category.
Because I wanted to fish.
I wanted to catch and learn.
I love casting with bait casting.
Started with a really cheap setup.
( Think my dad won it on an illegal peg board in a private bar setup. A firehouse business.)
Then went to spinning, totally immersed.
Fished with various baits and lures. Crane fly larvae make good bait, etc.
Went to flyfishing to be able to fish with flies, especially to catch native brookies and wild browns.
Especially fishing ants.
Growing up I spent almost every day walking fields and woodlots and instream, etc.
Got a library and God teaching me of streams, fields, fish, crayfish and scuds and Johnny Darter, and chub-suckers, and chubs and suckers, and plants, birds and animals, stones, geological aspects, springs to drink from, trees to climb ...
Elitism requires judgement.
Human judgement is crap.
Judgement by nature is truth.
Nothing about elitism in there.