Pat, the map hasn't changed much from March until now. Lots of red. Doesn't look good for extended forecast either.
Right. But again, March wasn't the time to worry. The fact that March was dry has no impact on now. And if March had been wet, now wouldn't be any better anyway. They have no (err, very little) bearing on one another.
But yes, now IS the time to worry. Some places are worse off than others, as is normal, but the "better" places are still below average, and the "worse" places are pretty bad.
EPA's gonna get some rain this evening. Discrete cells forming into a line as we speak. Just enough to maybe hold things over for a bit, but not a solution.
Ironic, I had flood warnings Friday (it didn't actually rain more than a tenth of an inch or so, and things remain low).
It means very little. The fish have survived for thousands and thousands of years in high water and low. It'll all average out
True, but in those thousands and thousands of years have been thousands of population fluctuations that are largely weather related. Nobody is concerned about extinction. We're concerned that populations will be temporarily reduced. By temporarily, we mean up to a couple of years.
It does all average out. Some years with abnormally high populations, some with abnormally low populations, averaged, makes "average" population levels. The concern is one of going from above average to below for the next year or three.