M
Mike
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2006
- Messages
- 5,561
Afish,
Thank you for the reference and abstract. The West Virginia University one has been recently published (reference below) in a respected, peer reviewed scientific journal, the Transactions of the American Fisheries Society and, as your abstract indicates, in comparing the Kamloop, Wytheville, and Case Western strains, when the fish were acclimated to 20 C (68 deg F) the critical thermal maximum for the Case Western strain was only 0.3 degrees F (.15 deg C) higher than for the worst performer, the Kamloop strain. "Worst" is a matter of one-and-a-half tenths of a degree F. This was statistically significant, but probably not biologically significant.
Note: This is not the 5-8 degree F better thermal tolerance mentioned above in #78, so I am wondering where that number originated.
In addition, the Case Western strain performed poorer in feeding and growth at 20 deg and 22 deg C. This is important in the Tully tail-race because the 8AM temperature objective at the gauge is 20 deg C (68 deg F) once mixing cold water from the bottom of Blue Marsh begins in late spring. The temperature does not usually fall below that once mixing begins. With a lower temperature objective, the lake would run out of cold water even sooner. In effect, we have pushed the Tully trout as far as we can, as 68 deg is where the stress begins.
Hartman, K and M. Porto. 2014. Thermal Performance of Three Rainbow Trout Strains at Above-Optimal Temperatures. Trans Am Fish Soc 143(6): 1145-1454.
Thank you for the reference and abstract. The West Virginia University one has been recently published (reference below) in a respected, peer reviewed scientific journal, the Transactions of the American Fisheries Society and, as your abstract indicates, in comparing the Kamloop, Wytheville, and Case Western strains, when the fish were acclimated to 20 C (68 deg F) the critical thermal maximum for the Case Western strain was only 0.3 degrees F (.15 deg C) higher than for the worst performer, the Kamloop strain. "Worst" is a matter of one-and-a-half tenths of a degree F. This was statistically significant, but probably not biologically significant.
Note: This is not the 5-8 degree F better thermal tolerance mentioned above in #78, so I am wondering where that number originated.
In addition, the Case Western strain performed poorer in feeding and growth at 20 deg and 22 deg C. This is important in the Tully tail-race because the 8AM temperature objective at the gauge is 20 deg C (68 deg F) once mixing cold water from the bottom of Blue Marsh begins in late spring. The temperature does not usually fall below that once mixing begins. With a lower temperature objective, the lake would run out of cold water even sooner. In effect, we have pushed the Tully trout as far as we can, as 68 deg is where the stress begins.
Hartman, K and M. Porto. 2014. Thermal Performance of Three Rainbow Trout Strains at Above-Optimal Temperatures. Trans Am Fish Soc 143(6): 1145-1454.