I do fly fish almost exclusively when fishing for trout, but I very rarely fish in FFO only waters. I at least do not seek them out.
I am however an all tackle angler and been known to pick up an ultralight from time to time.
So consider this more serious post as about as unbiased as it gets on the subject. I really don't care if Center Pin is allowed in FFOs because I don't consciously seek those out to fish in. Special regs areas are for "special people."
Hey, I did say more serious, not completely serious.;-)
I haven't done the center pin thing, but I know what it is and have nothig against it. I just feel it is too easy. It is the same concept as using bait or flies on ultralight spinning gear only much longer. And Pat, I don't need a long explanation on how the tackle differs. I'm talking concept.
I have nothing against center pin. Next time I need a new spinning rod, I may get center pin instead if I intend to use it for bait in streams. But if I need new fly gear, I'm getting fly gear.
In response to Maurice, the inclusion of center pin in the proposal wording is baffling to me as well.
Here are a few questions for everyone to answer for themselves.
1. Why do you fly fish?
For me it is not a religious experience and had nothing to do with a movie or a fad. It is still fishing, and fishing gear does not make the angler. I often chose fly fishing over other gear because I find it more challenging and enjoyable, especially for trout.
Although I know in most cases I could catch more fish with spinning gear (or center pin), I still prefer fly fishing.
Any of you that argue you can catch more fish while fly fishing are only kidding yourself. In most cased you can't, provided you know what you are doing with spinning or center pin.
Next question.
2. Why does thee PF&BC have FFOs?
My serious answer would be tradition. I have a lot of less serious answers as well, but won't go there in this response.
3. Why does the fish commission not allow spinning gear in FFOs?
My answer would be, it's not the traditional art of fly fishing.
When nymph fishing, I can cast just as far with ultralight spinning equipment using the same terminal tackle as I would with a fly rod. Now, I have never Czech nymphed, or used a french tickler. Not that there is anything wrong with those, I just don't feel a need. Again, I said more serious, not completely serious. 18 foot leader not enough? Come on?!? You might as well be using spinning gear or center pin.
A few had argued the reason could be to allow newer technology. News flash. Spinning gear is newer than fly fishing, too. So we skip over spinning gear and go right to center pin because the equipment looks like fly gear?
Baffling.
Either get rid of it or leave it alone.
Part of this could be enforcement. From a distance, maybe it is hard for some enforcement officers to tell the difference from their truck between fly equipment with large arbor, and center pin. Aint that what those company issued binoculars are for?
However, if that is the case, here's a compromise. Let people use their center pin gear, but they must use a fly line at least as their running line and limit their "leader" length to 18 feet. It would be similar to some of these newer nymphing techniques and I'd imagine using a very light fly line would still spool out nearly as well. Maybe not as well, but somewhat functional. IMO, it isn't about using easiest methods.