SBecker
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2010
- Messages
- 5,669
jayL wrote:
The snake river is in idaho. The ocean is far from idaho. I'll take a guess that you're wrong, but choose not to do research.
.
Not wrong, just read the stupid article.
jayL wrote:
The snake river is in idaho. The ocean is far from idaho. I'll take a guess that you're wrong, but choose not to do research.
.
jayL wrote:
The establishment of the fisheries in erie and ontario is already done. The damage can't really be reversed.
You can't compare the relatively closed ecosystems of the great lakes and tribs to that of the delaware watershed and bay. It doesn't make any sense.
jayL wrote:
No time. I'm going to start sketching the wireframes out for a few websites to fight this campaign of idiocy, should it come to fruition.
jayL wrote:
No time. Gotta fight the stringer brigade and co. 🙂
Power plants? Stop before you embarrass yourself. The fisheries were fine for years despite the power plants. Hell, I had my best days fishing from TMI.
jayL wrote:
I'm not interested in the economic impact. I doubted your figures, but they have no bearing on my opinion on the subject.
Steelhead could #OOPS# gold and blue chip stocks and I would oppose this buffoonery.
And if you believed I was actually heading off to the labs to start designing websites, I have a fish farm in northampton county to sell you. :lol: I'd bet a significant sum of money that this whole thing is never even attempted, but I can promise that I'll be on the front lines to fight it if it is.
LRSABecker wrote:
I do not know Gfen why you are attacking me, as I stated before, I am not the one personally behind this and I am not the one that believe this will work. I am just stating what I have been told by people that know more then me. I will back it though if it proves to be true, just because of the financial windfall it could bring.
Were salmon and steel present in Erie, Ontario, or did they start stocking them? Don't here people complaining now do I? I would also guess that those tribs held brook trout as well?
gfen wrote:
LRSABecker wrote:
I do not know Gfen why you are attacking me, as I stated before, I am not the one personally behind this and I am not the one that believe this will work. I am just stating what I have been told by people that know more then me. I will back it though if it proves to be true, just because of the financial windfall it could bring.
Were salmon and steel present in Erie, Ontario, or did they start stocking them? Don't here people complaining now do I? I would also guess that those tribs held brook trout as well?
You are the messenger, you are on point. Welcome to the fire fight. If you don't like this, I suggest you remove yourself from the press releases and let someone else do the dirty work. Sorry, we still love you even if you're stupidly wrong on this subject. Now, then...
These people do NOT know more than you, they may even know less than you. What they know is mostly moot, to be honest. The only thing htat matters is what they want. Greed is the answer to the question here.
"Wouldn't it be nice if..." always means the bottom line is self serving.
Furthermore, there is no "financial windfall." No one cares! You want a financial windfall, spend some time turning around the economic development of the greater Lehigh Valley. You can work on supplemanting the steel and cement industries and pushing the whole "just like the Silicon Valley, just three hours faster ahahah!" thing they were doing a few years back. That's a financial windfall. Olympus moving ops here, thats a windfall. Having a 50K scruffy assjack fishermen showing up to practice combat fishing in the LV for 4 months a year is not.
Were steelhead or salmon present in the Great Lakes? Let me answer your question with a question: Why do you think its called the Salmon River? Of course the sea run rainbow trout were not present, since rainbows, both anadromous and potamodromous, are a Western North America species, they did not.
More interestingly, and I don't know the answer, is what effect have introduced steelhead runs in the Great Lakes had on the native salmon population there? I can't imagine that the vast schools of implanted rainbow trout following up the last few salmon up the river must do to the poor Atlantic salmon who called the Great Lakes h ome, but surely its going to be detrimental, as new predators are introduced to the ecosystem.
No doubt very few people thought to complain about the introduction of steelhead to the Great Lakes in the mid 19th century when it started, because at the time it was assumed the oceans and rivers of the world were a bountiful, and endless, source of food. There was a time when you were encouraged to kill every fish you stung with a hook, too, but for some reason we've all evolved beyond the stringer junkie* mentality to one where things made a little more sense.
In hindsight, many choices were awful. Places like Australia, an essentially closed ecosystem, are wracked with many problems due to introduced species by outsiders who thought they'd be a good idea. Rabbits for food, foxes for sport, and cane toads for pest control have all turned into downright, truly epic, failures, ecological holocausts for the unique species that once thrived there.
* - I knew i'd find a place for that eventually!
LRSABecker wrote:
Here is a link to what Idaho coalitions are saying the return of Salmon and Steel to the Snake River basin would bring in annually. I am just guessing that the Lehigh, Delaware is larger.
http://www.hydroreform.org/news/2005/08/02/restoring-idahos-fisheries-could-bring-over-500-million-annually-to-state-economy
LRSABecker wrote:
WTFL Did not read
LRSABecker wrote:
BTW There is a fish farm in Northampton County that another organization is looking to purchase.
LRSABecker wrote:
LOL Jerry u funny
LRSABecker wrote:
BTW There is a fish farm in Northampton County that another organization is looking to purchase.