JackM wrote:
If what you say is correct, why wouldn't the language just be: ...
Because you didn't write it???
I think you guys are reading way more into this than you need to.
"As used in this subpart, the term ‘‘approved trout waters’’ means designated waters that contain significant portions that are open to public fishing
[color=CC0000]and[/color] are stocked with trout."
That statement is simply a definition of "approved trout waters." You don't have to disect the definition when they actually provide a list of these waters.
Go to the "approved trout waters" section.
http://sites.state.pa.us/PA_Exec/Fish_Boat/fishpub/summary/troutwaters.html
I also believe you are misreading that statement I quoted.
It is a compound sentence where each half should be able to stand on it's own. In other words, the part where is says "significant portions" only refers to the first part of that compound sentence (are open to public fishing). they don't stock streams that do not fit that description. The second part is because they don't stock all waters that have significant portions open to public fishing. To me, that explains why some portions of streams are not "approved trout waters." Would I have written it differently? 0f course.
Switch the two halves of that sentence around and you will see what I mean.
"As used in this subpart, the term ‘‘approved trout waters’’ means designated waters that are stocked with trout
[color=CC0000]and[/color] contain significant portions that are open to public fishing."
OK, it looks even worse that way, but you can see what I mean. The fishing regs are full of misleading statements. However, in a correctly written compound statement, both halves should be able to stand on their own. For the engineers out there, read it as two sentences with a logic AND.
I'm no lawyer, but I'll bet my paycheck against yours that if you are fishing for suckers or catfish in Tionesta Creek above the dam and below the "approved" waters, and not harvesting any fish out of season, you won't get ticketed. And if you do, it won't hold up in court as long as you don't do something else stupid like get into a big argument with the WCO.
Bottome line: If an entire stream is listed, then you can't fish it right now unless it is one of the excetions. If boundaries are listed, then you can't fish within the boundaries and can fish outside those boundaries.