Sasquatch,
No one qualified freestoner until later in the discussion. OP mentioned "larger stems" and "before things were destroyed" and we moved on to specific streams, some people talking about freestoners, but in general if large wild brook trout can still be found in PA.
I DID NOT post those in all things brook trout, although I am on that page. None of those are my fish, and I only post my own fish or fish I help catch/net or "guide" for if you want it that. I don't know anything about the second two large fish, and they very well could be multiyear hold over stockers, have stocker blood, or be fully wild/native. I can tell you the first fish is 100% wild, and freestone. I can tell you I have seen fish larger than any in the pictures, on a freestone influenced lake in Pa. I'm not sure what caliber you are talking about, but the first fish is wild and freestone, and I can imagine a few other fish over the years have gotten to that size or bigger. That one was released and could still be there.
pcray,
I feel the same. I was very skeptical if they were wild when I first saw them, but no way to know for sure. The first one is wild as I said, and I have plans made to make a few trips on this stretch of water this spring, I have fished headwaters and other sections but haven't been able to make the long trek in yet. BTW, it's more than a 3 mile walk from a road...
misanthropist,
again, I said in an earlier post, I don't know the stream, I said it was SE/east pa so it's very likely a limestoner. I also found out that it is in an area most people don't think that there are fish still ,ie big water section of whatever it is. sasquatch says someone on facebook said it was a limestoner, idk. Not my fish, and I'm not making claims. I was told it was a wild PA fish, and thats what this is about. No one said they had to be out of a 3 foot wide freestoner, until it was brought up later in the conversation. You weren't super specific in the first post haha. You're not gona find big fish in little water, and I agree freestone conditions are less conducive to big fish size. Yet again, that first picture is a freestoner. Maybe it only takes the right size/conditions and pressure to produce a few big trophy sized brookies. They sure aren't all over the state, I have caught less than a dozen over 10" in the last few years fishing for a lot more brookies. I have caught some nice ones, including a close 12" and a few 10-11". But nothing like these, and I won't even try to claim that.
Again I want to make clear these aren't my fish. I do know where some big ones are, but haven't been able to fool them yet. There are probably a dozen streams in the state capable of producing regular 12"+ brook trout and a few lakes, but thats about it. They are out there, and if you go to the right lengths, fish hard enough, you might be lucky enough to catch one.
Just like the guy in the 30" brown post. Right place, right time, lots of work. You probably won't catch a lot, but if you get a big one it's worth it. I broke off the biggest brookie of my life fishing a freestoner last week, was pretty bummed. Landed 3 10" fish that day. I have fun catching no matter what. This is a great topic to discuss, but at the end of the day I'm just gona fish and enjoy myself, and if I happen into a big boy somehow some day, or feel crazy enough to pursue them constantly, I might nab one. They surely aren't anywhere near common to catch, especially around here. I do envy you limestone guys for that one.
Thanks for the friendly and professional discussion to all the guys on this board.
Edit: I didn't see you specify non spring creeks anywhere, maybe it was implied or added later. Still. first fish is freestone, other one unknown, supposedly limestone. most freestones that can support big brooks are filled with browns now, but there is the possibility for them to be out there and are a few big untouched streams out there hiding.