During the extreme drought of 1999, I walked along the upper part of Hammersley Fork, starting from the top and walking downstream.
In that case, ALL of the trout were in the larger pools, because there was no water in the stream channel other than in those pools. Most of the channel was dry.
This shows the importance of pool habitat. During extreme drought, pools are the only places with water, so the only places trout can survive.
Beaver ponds are very large pools and have habitat for large numbers of brookies to survive the drought.
I wonder what the agencies: PFBC, Game Commission, DCNR, ANF have for a management plan for beaver populations. Are they trying to increase populations? Increase their distribution? Or trying to keep populations low? Or about the same?
There are lots of small streams out there on public forest lands. Why aren't there more beaver ponds? Also, I've seen several places where beaver ponds were there, now they're not. Was that a natural situation of them moving on to another site? Or was it a man-caused change?