fishing license and stamps pay a lot of the freight on fisheries management and enforcement. I read regularly about how enforcement of fly only and other special regulations areas is not strong enough (and I'm inclined to agree).
And we don’t have enough habitat restoration (also agree)
And every time someone raises the subject of fishing licenses (and stamps), there’s outrage that they are too expensive.
And before someone says, “just do away with regulations and management and everything will be great,” let me point out that open water trout streams are already fished out by mid May. Ponds where you can keep bass have no bass worth catching in them.
Managing a fishery is expensive. And managing a public fishery requires public money.
Instead of saying a fishing license and trout stamp are too expensive, ask what it costs to manage a wild trout program (protect it from poaching and ensure pollution and other environmental hazards are prevented).
Fisheries biologists are the people on the front lines of preventing development practices that cause creeks to fill with silt, and similar practices that, left unchecked, destroy wild trout habitat.
If you fish for wild trout, you are the beneficiary of an evolving management program that saw the flaws of stocking swarms of trout in the old trophy ffo spots and transitioned to protecting wild fish with fro artificial only, no kill and limited stocking. I’m old enough to remember when falling springs and big spring were like fishing in a hatchery, and that was a mess (in my opinion).
Overall we have got better wild trout fishing now than at any time in my 61 years, and generally good management is the reason. And that’s not free. (And when I say good, I don’t mean perfect.)
Don’t be the guy who demands excellence and then refuses to pay for it.