That's always been a pet peeve of mine with TU as well. It's open to bait and spin fishermen, they purport to welcome those types, and their mission certainly transcends tackle choice decisions. But it has a bit of a FF club feel. All the presentations and so forth are FF based. The gifts are fly rods and reels or FF related. 95% of the people are flyfishermen and talk fly fishing at all meetings. It just seems unwelcoming to spin and bait fishermen.
Someone said you can teach a FF class but not a powerbait class. I call B.S. on that. Well, powerbait was an intentional swipe, it's like the junk fly category of the bait fishing world. But you certainly can teach spinner making, minnow rigging, color preferences, technique, etc as it relates to spin or bait fishing. And stream ecosystems, geology of waterways, reading water, ways to find streams, etc. are not specific to tackle choice. Instead of a fly rod as a gift, offer a top of the line Loomis spinning rod or something as an alternative.
Some of it is just reinforcement. The members are flyfishermen, they want to see fly fishing stuff, so they offer fly fishing stuff and talk fly fishing. And it just reinforces that it's a fly fishing club. TU needs to make a concerted effort to attract the spin/bait crowd, rather than just give it lip service and say "we're open to all". Their potential membership pool would quadruple at least. It's a two way street, though. The bait and spin guys need to join up and help push for that change.
But Mike, yeah, the message the public gets about TAP isn't that it's opposed to tackle restrictions, it's that it's opposed to HARVEST restrictions. And a lot of it has to do with that website, which outright attacks C&R, Trophy Trout, and the like, despite the fact that these regs can be, and often are, all-tackle. Most dont' associate them with tackle restrictions. They sometimes are accompanied by tackle restrictions, but they are two separate and only marginally related questions. Make it clear you oppose TACKLE restrictions and support harvest restrictions. Instead of opposing current special reg zones, lobby for them to be switched to all-tackle. And propose new all-tackle special reg areas.
You'll still find some honest opposition, but I think the group would be less derided and more respected if you spelled this out more clearly. And I think there's a sizable group that would be at least sympathetic to such a position, but is not sympathetic to open harvest on some of our blue-ribbon waters.