LehighRegular wrote:
This bill has not been voted on yet. Its "on the table", but they may get to it this week. There is still time to write your legislator.
Becker - I met with Heffley back in March. That guy is misguided with regards to trout and how the management of trout will affect recreation in his district. Not good!
LehighRegular wrote:
This bill has not been voted on yet. Its "on the table", but they may get to it this week. There is still time to write your legislator.
Becker - I met with Heffley back in March. That guy is misguided with regards to trout and how the management of trout will affect recreation in his district. Not good!
SBecker wrote:
Yes Heffley touts himself as an outdoorsman. But God damn it he doesn't understand #censor#. He has the mindset of a local put and take fishermen. He just can not understand the revenue that is created with wild trout fisheries. Feel like an idiot for voting for him. Won't make that mistake again.
oncorhynchusmykiss wrote:
. You can't really trust alot of TU chapters anymore anyway aside from CVTU and a few others.
oncorhynchusmykiss wrote:
Alot of TU chapters just hang out, get hammered, and b.s. Some of em are buying up public water, posting it, and charging admission (not so much in PA as out west and in VA) For other people TU is just a stupid status symbol. I think the least TU could do if they're managing fisheries is to manage them for native species rather than the easiest species to manage, i think it says something about "conserve and restore" in their mission statement somewhere. I also think the TU national adgenda is focused too much on climate change, didymo, selling Patagonia/orvis products, and alot of other red herrings. There are alot of organizations that take advantage of TU to sell their "conservation" products and ideas which really don't do a whole lot for conservation. It's just like a sub division of the government, it has potential to corrupt and in some cases it has. There are good things that TU chapters do, CVTU has done restorations on almost every limestoner in their valley for example. All I'm saying is be careful who and what you listen to or our fisheries may end up like Europe. Some of you probably wouldn't mind that though.
oncorhynchusmykiss wrote:
It's not that bad. The state has almost all wild streams classified already. They already have the ability to classify any wild trout stream as a class a or class f if they need to just by which area they select to survey. PA politics is corrupt, all this thing means that we as anglers have to pay closer attention to all the streams we fish. If something is out of place or wrong with a stream tell everybody you know that fishes it about it and either go do some work on the stream or go nag your reps about it. You can't really trust alot of TU chapters anymore anyway aside from CVTU and a few others.
You apparently don't get out much.oncorhynchusmykiss wrote:
It's not that bad. The state has almost all wild streams classified already. They already have the ability to classify any wild trout stream as a class a or class f if they need to just by which area they select to survey. PA politics is corrupt, all this thing means that we as anglers have to pay closer attention to all the streams we fish. If something is out of place or wrong with a stream tell everybody you know that fishes it about it and either go do some work on the stream or go nag your reps about it. You can't really trust alot of TU chapters anymore anyway aside from CVTU and a few others.