If I'm reading the article right, it appears that about 27 additional miles are being added to trails/roads already open to ATV use(?)
While I don't favor this, it doesn't appear that this will result in widespread use by ATVs of sections currently off limits. Might dispersing the ATVs over more trails reduce environmental damage? I'm thinking out loud here.
Down here in SCPA in Michaux we have ATV trails and, while I don't follow this hobby, it appears to me that the numbers of riders has increased over the last year, especially on weekends (no surprise, just like kayaking, fishing, and everything else).
I wonder if DCNR, or a conservation organization, will monitor these new riding spots to document erosion/pollution, etc.? Such data is needed to argue against expanding ATV trails.
The article mentions the fees paid by ATV riders and, I suspect, the increase in funding this brings in will tempt the state to expand the trails.