![CLSports](/data/avatars/m/0/905.jpg?1640368487)
CLSports
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 29, 2007
- Messages
- 1,136
I guided for a short period of time and I HATED it. I am not a people person,
You picked the perfect username then!
I guided for a short period of time and I HATED it. I am not a people person,
Tigereye wrote:
While I dont get to do much field work anymore, my job has me on the front lines as an environmental engineer. I realize that I cant pursue my outdoor interests fly fishing and bird hunting without clean streams and good habitat. As such I always think about the impacts a project is going to have on the environment.
Usually the work includes developing Storm Water Erosion and Sedimentation Plans, Pollution Abatement Scrubbers, and other projects that PREVENT POLLUTION. My fishing friends say because I work for corporate America I use my environmental skills for the "Dark Side". My reply is would you rather have the accountants make the decisions? LOL
On the flip side, I am working on a remediation project CLEANING UP pollution at an historic soil contamination site. The site repaired locomotives in the late 1800 early 1900's. ie all the oils ,degreasers, and other chemicals were dumped in the "Back 40". Soil and ground water are contaminated and nearby homes may be impacted by vapors from contaminated groundwater infiltrating a 100+ year old deteriorated sanitary system that transverses the area.
The job has me interact with geologists, hydrologists, foresters, chemists, hygenists, gov't officials, civil engineers, politicians, corporate executives, sportsmen's groups, community groups, citizens and a host of other interested parties. Believe me, they all have an agenda.
The job forces me to see the reality of situations, and while the goal of all of the players is a clean environment, the how and the "how much" are the difficult questions. Its easy to point the finger and say "you pay for it" but when the "you" is a long defunct business and the cost needs to be shared, it amazing to see how peoples view change.
sarce wrote:
I work as a civil engineer focused on water resources (flood modeling, stormwater control, BMPs) and while I'm not working in an area that has any trout to protect, some of the work has water quality benefits. I don't think I'd be in this field if not for fishing giving me an interest in all things water related.
Jessed wrote:
I think it’s pretty safe to say all of use on the site have a strong passion for fly fishing or other types of fishing. I was wondering how many of you on this sight had chosen a career path affiliated with fishing or other types of jobs that work around water, geography, biology etc! If not do you think this type of work would have put a damper on your passion for fishing?
Jessed wrote:
I was wondering how many of you on this sight had chosen a career path affiliated with fishing or other types of jobs that work around water, geography, biology etc! If not do you think this type of work would have put a damper on your passion for fishing?
Please note this distinction is unique to Pennsylvania. As far as I know no other state splits game enforcement and fishing enforcement into two departments. The other states have Fish & Game, or even Fish, Game, & Parks under one department. That said, conservation officer jobs are a great opportunity. You can readily live in the best fly fishing spots in the world. Last time I checked Montana, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Colorado were all begging for conservation officer applicants.bigjohn58 wrote:
If you like fishing you would be better off being a game warden. If you like hunting you would be better off being a WCO.
larkmark wrote:
Go for the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.