W
wsender
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2010
- Messages
- 1,678
Save the money that you'd spend on books and book a day with Loren Williams. It's worth the money and the drive.
wsender wrote:
Save the money that you'd spend on books and book a day with Loren Williams. It's worth the money and the drive.
jdaddy wrote:
wsender wrote:
Save the money that you'd spend on books and book a day with Loren Williams. It's worth the money and the drive.
meh
george ftw. or paul. or charles.
wetnet wrote:
jdaddy wrote:
wsender wrote:
Save the money that you'd spend on books and book a day with Loren Williams. It's worth the money and the drive.
meh
george ftw. or paul. or charles.
Meh..You don't want to learn?
wetnet wrote:
wetnet wrote:
jdaddy wrote:
wsender wrote:
Save the money that you'd spend on books and book a day with Loren Williams. It's worth the money and the drive.
meh
george ftw. or paul. or charles.
Meh..You don't want to learn?
It is not always afforable to hire someone, but Loren WIlliams is not just a guide he is a true teacher, so should u get the opportunity contact him. I'd just contact him anyway
jdaddy wrote:
wetnet wrote:
wetnet wrote:
jdaddy wrote:
wsender wrote:
Save the money that you'd spend on books and book a day with Loren Williams. It's worth the money and the drive.
meh
george ftw. or paul. or charles.
Meh..You don't want to learn?
It is not always afforable to hire someone, but Loren WIlliams is not just a guide he is a true teacher, so should u get the opportunity contact him. I'd just contact him anyway
I have no problem spending money on a guide. I would suggest that there are excellent regional guides here that are just as equipped to teach without having to drive to Syracuse NY or further to spend money out of state. It is my opinion that one should support the local guys. I know that Loren is near and dear to you because of the competitive youth fly fishing thing, but you know local talent such as the aforementioned George Daniels actually won some of the international fly fishing competitions, thus would be pretty high in my book as well. I am not simply basing my recommendations upon perceived personal relationships. That's all.
jdaddy wrote:
wsender wrote:
Save the money that you'd spend on books and book a day with Loren Williams. It's worth the money and the drive.
meh
george ftw. or paul. or charles.
Speaking of George and nymphing, doesn't he have a book coming out in the near future?
Surface currents are basically always faster than bottom currents. If a surface indicator is not dragging, that means the nymphs below are being dragged along the bottom faster than the bottom currents. If you want your nymphs to travel at the speed of the flow, the flies need move at a speed slower than the surface current.
midnightangler wrote:
Speaking of George and nymphing, doesn't he have a book coming out in the near future?
He does. I've seen the early copies, and it looks great. Title is "Dynamic Nymphing":
http://www.amazon.com/Dynamic-Nymphing-George-Daniel/dp/0811707415
It is pretty funny how infrequently he is referred to by his actual name, George Daniel. Why does everyone want to add an "s"?
pcray1231 wrote:
Surface currents are basically always faster than bottom currents. If a surface indicator is not dragging, that means the nymphs below are being dragged along the bottom faster than the bottom currents. If you want your nymphs to travel at the speed of the flow, the flies need move at a speed slower than the surface current.
This is one reason I don't use floats if I can get away with it. That said, I can't always get away with it, and do sometimes use floats.
One thing I do when using a float is to "check" the float. It's basically that once you sense that the float is too far downstream of the nymph and is or will soon be dragging it, move the float upstream a little. Most of the time it's simply throwing a mend in the line out as far as the float, you throw it upstream a bit.
The disadvantage, of course, is that you are putting a little slack between the float and the nymph, which hurts strike detection. There's always that trade-off. Tight line = better strike detection but imparting some drag.
One thing that helps lessen the trade-off is making sure that all subsurface line is thin diameter. Don't sink your butts. That means short or absent butts and tapers, with long tippets. The fine diameter cuts through the current better, thus reducing drag, while still giving you sensitivity.
When going indicator-less, it's really amazing how slow the drift should be, you have to kind of see it to understand. The nymph needs to be truly just rolling along the bottom.
SBecker wrote:
O just to many jokes can be used after that post
Speaking of George Daniel...The newbies on here might be interested in learning from him hands on. The Western Pocono TU will be having a pig roast on Memorial Day in May and everybody is invited. George will be there the whole day and will be doing an on stream presentation and video presentation. This might be one of the cheapest and best times to learn from one of the best.
wetnet wrote:
There is no setting one teacher above another every one learns differently and until you really open yourself up you'll learn just one way from one teacher. When you are really awake you will learn everything from them and make it your own.
I love nymphing because there is a close connection for me when doing it.
Not a ton of advice as far as indicators, I just don't use thingabobbers or putty. I just have other things from one teacher and another.
I still suck if that makes anyone feel better. LOL!