![wildtrout2](/data/avatars/m/2/2119.jpg?1640368492)
wildtrout2
Well-known member
That would depend on who you ask. After about 40 years of catching small wild fish, it hasn't worn off for me.The novelty of catching small wild fish wears off too.
That would depend on who you ask. After about 40 years of catching small wild fish, it hasn't worn off for me.The novelty of catching small wild fish wears off too.
Me either. To each his own.That would depend on who you ask. After about 40 years of catching small wild fish, it hasn't worn off for me.
The Zen of fly-fishing.Heard a good quote on the Millhouse podcast, "To achieve mastery is to rise above the need to catch fish"
Pretty much the same here.That would depend on who you ask. After about 40 years of catching small wild fish, it hasn't worn off for me.
I agree with this. I love fishing remote brook trout steams for small fish. I also enjoy larger streams and larger fish. Over the years it seems that the most important part for me is the beauty of the surroundings. When I was younger I would fish a sewer pipe if I thought it may have a trout in it. Now, not so much.The novelty of catching small wild fish wears off too. You just don't know it when it hasn't already happened.
Like a lot of other aspects of life, variety and balance are important.
PmI like to catch fish regardless of size but they have to be “stream worthy”. For instance, in a native stream I’m fine with 3”- 6” fish. But if I catch only 3”- 6” in the Little J over the course of a day, I would be disappointed.
Although catching large fish is nice, I get impatient fighting a 20” fish on a 5wt rod since it’s easy exhaust them. Now, jack up that rod to 8wt or 9wt and you can land even large Great Lakes fish pretty easily.
I’m not generally a big fish chaser.
I care to fish at risers. Size is a bonus.