Didn't I do that with my example of the Upper Tulpehocken Creek?
My only point regarding your example was your reference points came from the stocking list.
Despite being the same as what is listed in the 2022 Summary, those coordinates are not the LEGAL definitions of the boundaries and they MAY not be the same for all streams when you compare them to the boundaries defined in the Summary. (I've seen it in the past).
From the Summary:
- LEBANON COUNTY
Tulpehocken Creek (Creamery Street bridge to 100 meters downstream from unnamed tributary downstream of T-618 bridge) (Section 2)
- BERKS COUNTY
Tulpehocken Creek (450 meters upstream Richland Road to Charming Forge Road bridge) (Section 4)
* Sections 6,7 & 8 are all in Berks and Special Regulations while 5 is the historic creek channel through Blue Marsh Lake.
With the exception of the Summary referring to Flanagan Road as T-618 (which I THINK is part of the legal definition), in regards to the Tully the limits on the Stocking List and the 2022 Summary are the same however; this isn’t always the case because the maps & coordinates aren’t always updated correctly or in a timely fashion to reflect changes made in the Summary, again that was my point.
Your earlier confusion regarding the “headwaters to mouth” verbiage in regards to the Tulpelhocken is a moot point because the Stocked Trout Waters boundaries ARE defined in both Lebanon & Berks Counties.
The entire stream being closed would ONLY apply if the Tulpelhocken was listed by NAME ONLY in the 2022 Summary under Lebanon & Berks Counties, which it ISN’T,
nor is any other stream in the entire state.
Therefore, if you can legally access you can legally fish (without harvest) Section 1 & 3 of the Tulpelhocken in Lebanon County and obviously Sections 6, 7 & 8 in Berks because they are Special Regulation.
IMHO it was a poor choice of language to put “headwaters to mouth” in the Summary just in case an ENTIRE new stream was added after that fact (which will never happen the way they list Stocked Trout Waters now)...but they put it in there anyway.
Bottom line, it’s perfectly clear (at least to me) and there really is NO reason to avoid fishing the entire Tulpehocken Creek or any other stream that happens to be stocked in defined areas this time of year.