![TimMurphy](/data/avatars/m/0/29.jpg?1640368480)
TimMurphy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2006
- Messages
- 2,915
Dear pcray,Of krayfishes shootout results. It's 6 years old and it's gotten worse since then.
43 different 5 weight line entries.
0 are below the target weight
1 is exactly on target weight
42 are above target weight
- 0 are below the AFFTA standard.
- 13 are within the AFFTA standard
- 31 are above the AFFTA standard.
- The median and average 5 wt lines are actually 6 wts. It's 100% accurate to say the average fly line is a size larger than what it is labeled. I'm not claiming dishonesty, many of them openly say it's 1 size larger or whatever. But they're still slapping a 5 wt sticker on a 6 wt line, then turning around and saying it's sized up to balance modern fast action (read, underlabeled) rods as a selling point, as if we couldn't have just bought a 6 wt line to begin with.
- 6 of the 43 lines rated as 5 wts are actually 8 wts or above and getting into ridiculous territory.
Including Cortland 444, btw. It is sized up 1 size.
I don't want to pick nits, B.S. - yes, I do! The Cortland 444 referenced in the test is the Modern Trout line and not the 444 Classic peach line. I think the peach line is still within its designated line size. I use it a lot on bamboo and fiberglass rods, and it seems to perform properly without feeling overly heavy.
If you want an accurately weighted line, try a Cortland 444 Sylk line. It's designed to aesthetically mimic silk fly line on bamboo rods. One of its advantages is that it is heavy for its diameter just line a real silk line. It works great on every rod I've ever tried it on, but it shines on older bamboo and fiberglass rods which generally have much smaller snake guides than modern rods of the equivalent line weight. In a 7 weight it shoots great on my Fenwick and Shakespeare glass 7 weights, even better than 444 peach does.
Regards,
Tim Murphy