![pcray1231](/data/avatars/m/1/1353.jpg?1649698015)
pcray1231
Well-known member
Actually, it was you who were right, the two terms really aren't that related. However, to be technical, fluorocarbon is also monofilament!
Co-polymer - At least 2 different polymers are used to complete the polymer chain. This is on the molecular scale. From a manufacturing standpoint, it can be drawn into as many lines as you wish.
Monofilament - 1 single strand was drawn. As opposed, to say, drawing multiple lines and braiding them, or furling them, etc. This speaks to manufacturing method, and has nothing to do with the molecular arrangement of polymers.
Fluorocarbon is a monofilament. It's a plastic drawn into a single line. Rather than fluoro vs. mono, we should simply stick with fluoro vs. nylon (although a co-polymer implies that it's not "just" nylon).
But yeah, regarding the marketing, they'll take a false public perception and run with it.
Co-polymer - At least 2 different polymers are used to complete the polymer chain. This is on the molecular scale. From a manufacturing standpoint, it can be drawn into as many lines as you wish.
Monofilament - 1 single strand was drawn. As opposed, to say, drawing multiple lines and braiding them, or furling them, etc. This speaks to manufacturing method, and has nothing to do with the molecular arrangement of polymers.
Fluorocarbon is a monofilament. It's a plastic drawn into a single line. Rather than fluoro vs. mono, we should simply stick with fluoro vs. nylon (although a co-polymer implies that it's not "just" nylon).
But yeah, regarding the marketing, they'll take a false public perception and run with it.