Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commisssion teams with drillers

Acristickid

Acristickid

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
5,358
Location
CA,BC
From the Pittsburgh Tribune Review:


Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission teams with gas drillers

By Bob Frye, TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Sunday, March 13, 2011

The details

The Fish and Boat Commission's gas leasing and water access programs will offer resources with some restrictions.

• No wells can be drilled on commission property, nor can any equipment can be installed there.

• Companies wanting water will have to pump it off site, rather than backing tanker trucks up to a lake.

• Water withdrawals will be monitored with gauges and will come to a halt when certain levels are reached.

• No water withdrawals will be allowed on high-use angling days, like the trout season opener.

About the writer


A state agency responsible in part for making sure gas drillers don't harm the environment is going to take money from those same corporations.

If its hand is being forced — as some say — at least anglers and boaters will benefit.

This past week, Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commissioners adopted a natural gas leasing program with an eye to selling the Marcellus Shale gas that lies under its 43,000 acres of property. Commissioners also adopted a water access program that will allow the agency to sell water from its lakes to drillers.

Neither program will lead to more wells being drilled, and both might lead to less, said commission executive director John Arway. They will give the commission some say in the process either way.

"This is just understanding that this is going on around us and we need to either be part of this or we're going to be impacted negatively, at least on the financial end," Arway said.

"We have to be good stewards, not only of the water in our lakes, but of the gas under our lakes, because we hold that in trust."

Drillers already have asked about Donegal Lake in Westmoreland County and the drained Dutch Fork Lake in Washington County, he said, and commissioners might be asked to approve individual leases for those or other properties as soon as this summer.

No one could say how much money the programs might generate. But the commission had no choice but to get involved, said board vice president Bob Bachman of Lancaster County.

"Marcellus Shale is here. There isn't anything the Fish and Boat Commission can do to make it go away. The question is, what can we do that's in the best interests of the resource?" Bachman said.

Still, several commissioners said voting for the programs was not easy.

Commissioner Len Lichvar of Somerset County said the board had no choice since lawmakers opened the state to drilling before it was ready and have since failed to enact an impact fee on the gas industry.

"Both of these failures compel us as an agency to control our own destiny in both oversight and income generation within our ability to do so, and we will," he said.

Commissioner Warren Elliot of Franklin County was the only one to vote against the gas leasing program and one of two — with commissioner Ed Mascharka of Erie County — to vote against the water program.

"I have a fundamental concern with the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission contracting with and receiving funds from companies that it has regulatory oversight and enforcement powers over," Elliott said.

Arway, though, said both programs will benefit sportsmen.

The top priority will be to use revenues to repair high-hazard dams. The commission has a $36 million backlog of repairs at those dams, at least two of which — Upper and Lower Hereford Manor in Beaver County — are scheduled to be breached this spring because there's no money to bring them up to Department of Environmental Protection safety standards.

John Ball, president of the Hereford Manor Lake Conservancy and Watershed Group, was thrilled to hear of the potential funding.

"If all of this is true, and people mean what they said, this could be a huge breakthrough for funds for Hereford Manor," Ball said.

And if the money is coming from a source no one could have predicted years ago, that's the new reality, Arway said.

"I believe we would be irresponsible if we didn't do this," he said.







More Outdoors headlines
Hunters' increase in buck kills leads to greater deer harvest
Weekly tips for the area outdoorsmen
Notes from the outdoors
Range permits required starting next month
Marcellus Shale info available for sportsmen
Outdoors notices
Prepping for trout season no easy task
Subscribe to the Tribune-Review today



Read more: Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission teams with gas drillers - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/sports/outdoors/s_727160.html#ixzz1GUcbGAkL
 
This does not surprise me. Everybody is on the take! I guess money talks. The PFBC just lost my respect! SHAME ON THEM!
 
Interesting dilemma. I kind of like them being more involved in the process, as increasing communication, and finding solutions to problems, is much easier that way. i.e. you have more control by working closely with them than simply opposing them at every step.

But I do understand the issue with the commission recieving money from companies for which it is charged with regulating, and that definitely makes me uncomfortable.

It also says that there will be no wells on commission property. I assume that means that whats going on is they're going under commission property.
 
I am surprised at people take on this.

1) They are on the take? Our lakes, streams and rivers are regularly being drained of water with little regulation. This enables PFBC to have some form of control over this, at least in those limited areas that they own.

2) Pcray, you say that you have an issue with PFBC receiving money from the companies they are charged with regulating. What regulating authority does PFBC have over the companies? I thought this was the domain of DEP?

 
you are right jdaddy. the PFBC has no more power than each of us do in regards to regulating the industry.

The PFBC is not necessarily a conservation group though is it? I mean, look at the DEP, they are doing absolutely nothing to stop this craziness so I wouldn't expect the PFBC to turn down some cashflow to make a point. Do I agree with their decision? nope. but I definitely am not surprised at it with all the greed and corruption going on at the state level right now.
 
Back
Top