Kelly Galloup on $1000 rods

Google pays the creator of the video $55 for every $100 paid by advertisers. The more hits he gets the more the advertisers pay. As of last week that has 40,000 hits. Highly watched content like that can generate 0.30 per hit, but using the average of 0.18 per hit that's $7,200. I got this info from a Google accountant.
so you know a google accountant?

Forbes estimates that for every 1,000 views, YouTube pays roughly $5. Creators need at least 1 million subscribers to earn approximately $60,000 annually,

Kelly only has 5.1k subscribers
 
Last edited:
Budget friendly rods can be surprisingly good investments as well 9 (if they're truly good rods). Winston passports are selling on EBay for as much or more than they sold for new.
 
I also can tell the difference between rods that suit my way of casting and which do not.

But in a blind casting test, could you tell the difference between rods that cost $1000 and those that cost 1/3 that much?

I think that would be difficult, because you can find rods with similar actions at those price points.
Okay. I see what you mean. Hard to say. I recently tested the second line of Orvis rods in a 9 ft 4 wt and it sure felt good to cast. I do wonder how much better the Helios is, and if I actually could tell the difference.
I do know I have tried (and returned) rods I paid high dollars for because I did not like them. One was an expensive Winston and I am a fan of a few of the Winston rods. One other thing I have noticed...It is one thing to try a rod when casting on grass but another to really fish it.
 
Mainly at fly fishing shows, I've gotten a bunch of rods out and cast them. And you pick em up without looking, cast, pick up another, cast, etc. It's the best way to compare rods.

1. My absolute #1 favorites have always been expensive rods. When designed for what I like, they are better rods.
2. My least favorites have often been expensive rods as well. The ones you say, man, this one's terrible... They've been designed for someone else. And whatever it is I don't like, they do it better too, lol.
3. Low-mid range rods often have an "eh, it's fine" factor. They don't blow me away but they're perfectly fine tools. Nothing overly wowing, nor overly off-putting.

4. And most important. This is casting back to back to back and paying attention to fine differences. If 2 rods are designed how I like it, for me, I may pick up a $200 rod and say "I like that", then pick up a $800 and say "ok, that's even better." Just because I could actually tell the difference, when casting them back to back, and really paying attention to the differences. That doesn't mean that the $200 rod isn't going to do everything I would ever ask it to do on a stream. I don't pretend the $800 rod is going to catch me more fish or give me more enjoyment while fishing. I am perfectly happy to get the $200 rod I liked well enough and spend the other $600 on gas/lodging to go fishing... It's like guns. The expensive rifles are prettier, and, in general, last longer, break down less, and hold a little better group too. Will the cheap rifle do the job? Yep. Are the expensive ones objectively better? Yes. Is a rifle that costs 5x as much, 5x better? No, not unless you're talking dangerous game or something. And yeah, there are expensive rifles that don't fit the purpose too. You don't take a groundhog gun elephant hunting, just like you don't toss heavy streamers into the wind with a finesse dry fly rod, nomatter how good of a finesse dry fly rod it is.
 
Last edited:
so you know a google accountant?

Forbes estimates that for every 1,000 views, YouTube pays roughly $5. Creators need at least 1 million subscribers to earn approximately $60,000 annually,

Kelly only has 5.1k subscribers
I do, so what.
 
I think @stephenb is on to something here.
 
thanks for the spell check! 😎
Getting back to the subject of casting fly rods now that we’ve accounted for the correct spelling of the word accountant:

“What does casted mean? Casted is an incorrect past tense conjugation of the verb cast. It almost never appears in print or edited works of any kind.”

I was once an accountant of sorts (now retired) and I don’t know if that's the reason or not, but I take account when someone says “casted”.
 
Exact quote from a guy in the audience while Kelly Galloup was giving a presentation last weekend. “I only watch two things online, pornography and fly tying videos and your video on $1000 rods was the best thing I’ve ever seen”. 😂
 
Avoid the Orvis Encounter entry level kit. It is terrible. There are much better entry level kits. The Clearwater rods are much better.
Encounter is ok for some basic use, but I agree the Clearwater is way better. Now, when I compare the $200 Clearwater euro nymph rod to the $1000 Sage ESN, the difference is minimal. I don’t see the need or the value to spend 5x for a rod that is only slightly better
 
Pat,

Sub $200.....

Redington CT is a crowd pleaser

Redington Path and Vice are also good

As mentioned, Taylor Dynamix has rave reviews. Taylor > Moonshine

Echo carbon xl
 
The CT is a more easy casting rod on the medium side of medium fast. The Vice is fast action and casts with good line speed. The Carbon XL which I believe is being replaced is a excellent med fast rod. All good rods.
 
What about cost associated with country of manufacture?
  • Orvis Clearwater (China) $249, Recon (USA) $598, Helios (USA) $998
  • Hardy Ultralite (S. Korea) $895
  • Taylor Dynamix (China) $199, Truth/Anomoly (S. Korea) $699
  • Redington CT (China?) $199
  • Sage Foundation (USA) $495, Sonic (USA) $600, Trout LL (US) $925, R8 (USA) $1050
  • Scott Flex (US - now discontinued) $475, GS (US) $895, Centric (USA) $945
  • ECHO Carbon XL (China?) $199, Trout X (China?) $399
  • TFO Pro III (S. Korea) $229, LK Legacy (S. Korea) $319
I have no problem with the S. Korean rods, but I’m willing to pay a reasonable amount more for a comparable USA made rod (maybe $250-$350). Above that $ would require a noticeable improvement in performance, quality control, and customer service.
 
I just ordered the Taylor Dynamix 9' 5 wt based on recommendations. Without casting, based on reviews. If I love it, could become my bigger water rod when she's not with me. :) But not sure me casting would be applicable to what she'd like anyway.

Anyone who wants to give it a go on the lawn, it'll be at the jam.

Either way I got 2 graphite 9' 5 wt sticks now.
 
I think you made a good choice
 
I always liked Kelly he is a straight shooter. That is why I make my own Bamboo Rods because I couldn't afford one if not. I don't mind people critiquing my work or asking why I'm using bamboo for Smallies or steelhead or in OBX because I really don't care. Joe E
 
If money spent on a rod is not a consideration, then any rod is an option for purchase. But don't assume the most expensive is always the best, especially considering the abilities and conditions of an individuals actual casting and fishing. Putting tape over the labels of rods would surprise some anglers looking to buy the "best" rod. Again, you must cast a bunch of rods to determine which rod fits your casting abilities, the conditions, where and how you fish, as well as the type of fish you are after.
 
Yes, I buy rods based on the comment above, my rods just happen to be pricier. I have found that some lower costing rods can do close to what my costly rods can do but the cheaper rods can't replicate the action, tip recovery, and light feel of these rods. I also buy things for aesthetic appeal. I like a rod that feels well-built and has a good feeling cork grip.
 
Back
Top