JackM wrote:
I hope we will hear more candid comments from Fishtales as a result. I found this poignant:
"My only regret is that I failed to achieve a sustainable future for the agency and its programs."
Not true at all, but beautifully humble.
TimRobinsin wrote:
All of this to say: I realize there is a push for dramatic changes in the PFBC and many of the causes I sympathize with.
FishTales wrote:
Thanks to all for your interest in our Commonwealth fisheries and voicing opinions about how to make things better. All I can offer is that I listened to all of your opinions on this Board and many other listserves, forums and blogs along with attending countless public meetings where I was always the first to arrive and the last to leave. I believe that I did my duty by dedicating 38 years of my life to the PFBC, Commonwealth anglers and boaters and the aquatic resources of our Commonwealth. The last 8 as Director were 24/7 365. I also feared no one but although that may seem insensitive to some it meant that I made decisions without fear of the consequences of my actions. This of course made many people inside and outside of the agency unhappy but I didn’t take the job to make everyone happy. I’ll let that for the those who run for elected office. BTW- politics had absolutely no influence over my decision to retire. Those who disagree with my leadership style or my approach at managing the agency can now step up, apply for the job and dedicate their time and efforts to advancing Resource First.
I am most proud to be a small part of a generation that was able to improve fishing opportunities in Commonwealth as measured by the fact that we have more waters to fish today than when we were children. That my fellow anglers is what it is all about. Now I’m going to enjoy the fruits of a life’s labor with friends and family while those of you evaluate the performance of the next Director. Arway over and out!
troutbert wrote:
TimRobinsin wrote:
All of this to say: I realize there is a push for dramatic changes in the PFBC and many of the causes I sympathize with.
What dramatic changes are being pushed for with the PFBC?
It seems to me that the legislators have been doing the same thing for a very long time:
1) Starving the PFBC of money.
2) Demanding that every stream in the state loaded up with hatchery trout, including native brook trout and wild brown trout streams.
Maybe there are some dramatic changes being pushed for behind the scenes. If so, what are those changes?