![salmonoid](/data/avatars/m/0/957.jpg?1640368487)
salmonoid
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2007
- Messages
- 2,721
JeffK wrote:
I eat a few fish a year, and unfortunately wild trout taste much better than stockies. For smaller trout I break the neck, but for lakers and larger trout from lakes I bleed them out. In general, I like to be prepared to keep fish on ice if I plan to keep a fish and only keep a fish if I cook it that day. I don't bother with the ice in winter. If you are eating anything it is only right to keep them in good shape. After all, as a fisherman I can get fish fresher than any store.
As an alternate to the C&R religion, one NYS guide, who kept the occasional fish, remarked that if a wild trout population was so stressed taking a few fish would harm it we probably shouldn't be fishing at all.
Why is it unfortunate that wild trout taste much better?
Agree 100% that if a wild fish population is so delicate that keeping a fish or two will cause it to spiral out of control and be extirpated, we shouldn't be fishing for them. It has often been said to keep the stockers - the state will just make more. Well, I wouldn't advocate harvesting every wild catch one catches, but guess what? Nature makes more of the wild ones too!