![The_Sasquatch](/data/avatars/m/5/5329.jpg?1701910553)
The_Sasquatch
Well-known member
Everyone who uses a Medalist on glass or bamboo is probably committing fly fishing fashion show heresy!
shakey wrote:
i have way more reels than rods.but i'm the kind of guy that likes click and pawl reels .even tuna cans.
i often use a reel based on the sound of the drag.
one of my favorite reels is an (eagle claw)granger medallion.i usually get them under thirty bucks.i have the whole line.
pcray1231 wrote:
I think most people like to match the quality of reel with the quality of rod. No use in tossing a plastic reel on a $700 rod.
That sounds ridiculous to me. Fishing isn't a fashion statement in my mind. I've got no problem mixing expensive gear with cheap gear.
I got streamerguy beat. I pair my $1000 rod with a $30 reel. And I pair my $90 rod with a $150 reel.
NCPAtrtbum wrote:
Martin 61, 10 bucks on ebay. Do it.
Of course people are stuck on the cosmetics of a fly reel. Spending more than 200 bucks on a reel for trout is silly.
With that being said, the BBS isn't a bad choice.
There's a lot of choices out there.
I'm such a sucker for loud obnoxious clickers!
pcray1231 wrote:
Your probably right. I'm quite the opposite. If I just bought an expensive rod, I say jeez, I can't add an expensive reel on top of this. Not now.
pcray wrote:
That sounds ridiculous to me. Fishing isn't a fashion statement in my mind.
I pair my $1000 rod with a $30 reel.
The_Sasquatch wrote:
Part of my attraction to glass is that I can buy a nice Fenwick relatively inexpensively, pair it with a Medalist for next to nothing, and people think my gear is awesome ;-)
ryguyfi wrote:
The_Sasquatch wrote:
Part of my attraction to glass is that I can buy a nice Fenwick relatively inexpensively, pair it with a Medalist for next to nothing, and people think my gear is awesome ;-)
They're pointing and whispering for a completely different reason...