Are polarized glasses a must?

[mcneishm]

Yes, absolutely. Except for dawn and dusk, I wear them all the time. Exceptionally helpful for seeing the bottom when wading as well as seeing structure in the water. You don't need to break the bank either. I don't think I've ever paid more than $25 for a pair and I always keep a spare set in my vest. I really wouldn't want to be without them.

 

[poopdeck]

My polarized prescription progressives that I bought for fishing is by far the most expensive piece of fishing gear I ever bought. They cost double what I have ever spent on a rod and well worth it to me.

 

[Fishnmusicn]

Eye protection, cutting down glare, being able to see structure and sometimes fish - don't leave home without them. Might save you from tripping over a rock. I've sighted some big trout in some very inaccessible sections of creek that I never would have seen otherwise.

 

[tjsingle]

I always have mine. I wear prescription Costa's and they are great.

 

[Acristickid]

I guess you could fish without glasses but why? This is America.

 

[redietz]

Absolutely yes. Less eye strain, protects your eyes from the harmful rays of the sun.

Only if they're also UV blocking. Many polarized glasses aren't.

 

[wbranch]

Only if they're also UV blocking. Many polarized glasses aren't.

Yes, agreed. You bring up good point.