An Alternative to An Expensive Traditional Tying Material

mt_flyfisher

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 20, 2014
Messages
974
City
SE PA
Probably one of the oldest and best known wet flies is the Partridge and Orange. It’s a very simple fly that calls for an orange Pearsall silk body with Hungarian Partridge hackle. The problem with using Pearsall’s silk, if you can find it, is that it’s getting pretty doggone expensive, as you can see from what was sold on EBay a few days ago.

IMG_4447.jpeg


Yesterday, I found this Embroidery thread on Facebook Marketplace. All of those 1000m spools in a nice plastic case with a handle for $20.00. I really liked the color selections, so I bought it.

image2.jpeg


It is slightly larger diameter than the Pearsall’s silk, but I think you could easily tie flies down to #20’s or so. And, I don’t see much difference between this orange embroidery thread color and the Pearsall’s silk orange that I’ve been using for the Partridge and Orange wet fly.

image1.jpeg


Embroidery thread is relatively inexpensive, and comes in just about every color imaginable. Think it will work?

P.S. I’m half tempted to book a beat on a well known British chalk stream and fish wet flies downstream tied with this embroidery floss. 😃
 
I use a bright red high tensile strength UTC for the thread bodies on my partridge and orange. I often like a minute amount of dubbing as well with one strand of crystal flashabou wrapped around it.
 
Thanks for the heads up on the embroidery thread idea, John. The thing about Pearsall’s is the diameter of the actual material is less. Does it really matter … probably not. I actually always thought the thickness of Pearsall’s was too big for small soft hackles. I don’t like big heads on my soft hackles. However, that’s just my thing. I don’t see myself buying any more Pearsall’s silk at this point in my fly tying career - particularly at $10 a spool.
 
Thanks for the heads up on the embroidery thread idea, John. The thing about Pearsall’s is the diameter of the actual material is less. Does it really matter … probably not. I actually always thought the thickness of Pearsall’s was too big for small soft hackles. I don’t like big heads on my soft hackles. However, that’s just my thing. I don’t see myself buying any more Pearsall’s silk at this point in my fly tying career - particularly at $10 a spool.
The embroidery thread that I got is size 40. It’s quite strong, and is thicker than Pearsall’s silk. It’s pretty obvious that the head on my fly is large - too large.

I don’t know much about that particular embroidery thread, which is Madeira, from Germany. I do see from their website that it comes in 30, 40 and 60 weight, with 60 being the smallest, which would probably be better suited for smaller flies.
 
L to R: Pearsall’s Gossamer silk, Ephemera silk, Danville waxed Flymaster 6/0 (70 denier), Belding Corticelli Buttonhole Twist.

The two silk threads are very similar in thickness to the Danville 6/0. The Buttonhole twist is the oddball - much thicker. The old time Yorkshiremen who created the North Country soft hackle flies often tied with buttonhole twist. They probably just used what they could find locally.

On the other hand some of the Yorkshire soft hackle enthusiasts (as opposed to commercial tiers ) preferred a slimmer, more delicate fly. Edmonds and Lee in their famous book (Brook and River Trouting) recommended Pearsall’s gossamer silk by name.

IMG_8200.jpeg
 
i dont think fish know the difference between Pearsall's and embroidery threads

good substitution
 
Top