PAgeologist
Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2013
- Messages
- 255
Tumbling Run I believe is underlain by a quartzite and/or metarhyolite formation - neither of which is going to provide a whole lot of alkalinity or buffering capacity.
PAgeologist wrote:
Well, if the Millstone watershed is worthwhile (if it meets our criteria), I may end up doing some projects there to get it restored some day. If it is part of the Allegheny or Ohio River basins its my area. Right now, I got a major one on the Blacklick in Indiana County and several others that I am a part of. Once some of those clear out, I will be looking to pick up some new ones.
Maybe I will take a trip up there soon to check it out just to get out of the office.
bearfisherman wrote:
FD,
I have seen many of the same things in the Upper Millstone watershed. While you would think that area would be decent for natives, many of those streams are just dead.
The whole watershed has gone downhill in the last couple decades. The main stem and east branch used to have lots of natives - I haven't seen one in years.
bearfisherman wrote:
FD,
I have seen many of the same things in the Upper Millstone watershed. While you would think that area would be decent for natives, many of those streams are just dead.
The whole watershed has gone downhill in the last couple decades. The main stem and east branch used to have lots of natives - I haven't seen one in years.
bearfisherman wrote:
That was my thought on it - the soils have just lost their buffering ability to any sort of acid precipitation, or snowmelt runoff. While the increased traffic due to gas development might have some recent effect on it, this has been a problem for more years than that.
We had a spot on the East Branch that used to be one of our go to spots for legal-sized natives. Haven't caught one there for years now.
I don't think that the swamp helps much either with summer warming.
MHanes wrote:
yeah the entire area is terrible stay away stay away! You will never catch quality trout in the national forest its totally a waste of time to try! 😉
Head to around Pittsburgh I hear the wild trout fishing is awesome there.
pcray1231 wrote:
lol.
I'm not real familiar with Millstone, but do agree with you FD on the Salmon Creek drainage. That one would be worth a look too. There is one decent trib (Little Salmon), but just decent, not great. The Branch also has a few wild fish, but is far from good. But most of the tribs should hold brookies and don't, and the main stem itself won't even hold stockies for very long. And while it is overfished after stockings, harvest isn't the main issue. They leave. And you can verify this by fishing around the mouth, it is a non-stocked section of the Tionesta that becomes a hot spot a few days after they stock Salmon.
Ashame, too, because Salmon is a relatively large stream that has good structure and does stay cold.
The Branch, too.
I don't really know that the problem is acid there, but always suspected it.
greenghost wrote:
I used to hang out in that area (Cook Forest) years ago. I would fish for natives in Toms, Cathers, Maple, Coleman Run and many others. One of the first times I ever fished the Sulphur hatch was on Cathers. It seemingly brought every fish in the stream to the surface.
I began to notice a change in the late 70s early 80s. Fewer bugs. Less fish. Sterile streams. Got to be so bad I quit making the trek up that way. Last time I was there was 15 years ago.
FarmerDave wrote:
Didn't you notice the posted sings on Coleman, Shrec? ;-)
greenghost wrote:
FarmerDave wrote:
Didn't you notice the posted sings on Coleman, Shrec? ;-)
Dave, back when I fished it, there were none.
That area of the state has quite a few infertile streams, I'm not sure why, but it's probably AMD. But then AMD doesn't just come from coal mines.Swattie87 wrote:
A stream that strikes me as being another one that suffers from poor natural buffering (but is not in an AMD area) is Tumbling Run (E. Branch Antietam trib) in the southern part of Michaux SF. While there aren't necessarily a ton of great streams in that area, there are many that have wild Brookies in them. Tumbling Run is a classic looking, steep, and fairly decent sized plunge pool stream...but there's no Brookies in it. Frustrating when you're looking at pretty much perfect Brookie habitat in every bathtub pool. The stream bottom on that stream is a very fine white gravel, bordering on really big sand in places really...which given the absence of Brookies I assume is a poor natural buffer against acidic conditions?
Yeah acidic streams. Strange thing is there were mayflies in them when I fished them but I didn't catch anything in them.FarmerDave wrote:
pcray1231 wrote:
lol.
I'm not real familiar with Millstone, but do agree with you FD on the Salmon Creek drainage. That one would be worth a look too. There is one decent trib (Little Salmon), but just decent, not great. The Branch also has a few wild fish, but is far from good. But most of the tribs should hold brookies and don't, and the main stem itself won't even hold stockies for very long. And while it is overfished after stockings, harvest isn't the main issue. They leave. And you can verify this by fishing around the mouth, it is a non-stocked section of the Tionesta that becomes a hot spot a few days after they stock Salmon.
Ashame, too, because Salmon is a relatively large stream that has good structure and does stay cold.
Agree 100%.
The Branch, too.
Agree about 75%.;-) It's a beautiful stream and cold, but the parts of it that I fished were fairly flat and lacking structure. No idea why, but it is the reason I didn't explore it more.
I don't really know that the problem is acid there, but always suspected it.
Definitely acid. There was some years where the Fish Commission didn't even stock it because the PH was too low. And notice they only stock brook trout in there. Browns would probably die within a half hour or so. Not always and not everywhere of course.
Little Salmon might be marginally better, but I don't remember every fishing it. I can however tell you that every trib of Salmon creek that is listed as having reproduction is Class D including Salmon, Little Salmon, and The Branch. The information I am looking at is over 12 year old (and proprietary;-)), but I doubt much has changed.
All that said, some of my best native trout fishing has been in small class C and D streams.
As far as the Millstone drainage goes, using the PFBC lists, East Branch has no natural reproduction in it or in any of it's tribs. West Branch has 3 small tribs with reproduction and none of those are on my old list. All within a national forest, too. By now, if there were ANY trout found, it would be on the list.
The drainage has been described well in this thread. Silt problem, and would dissolve Sandfly's mower in under a year. Somebody should crop dust the entire ANF with Tums.
I've only ever fished the Millstone drainage for stocked trout because it was convenient at the time. And stocked trout is all I ever caught. And the last time was probably 6 or 8 years ago.
Beautiful scenery, but... I'm not joking, either. A real shame.
Chaz wrote:
Lots of caddis, too. We will have to have a discussion on those streams some day.
As Spring Creek and Millstone go (the ones in the ANF), for the most part I have only fished the main streams where they are stocked. there is at least one exception in the Spring Creek drainage which in my opinion is not nearly as bad, and I caught quite a few. I don't know the name of that trib, but I could find it again.;-)
My guess is most of the Spring Creek tribs, although impaired, still have some reproduction. Just not a lot of it.