![TheBluegillMaster](/data/avatars/m/45/45699.jpg?1693881080)
TheBluegillMaster
Member
yeah, I think it’s best put that way. I know it’s a “popular” stream, but still don’t want to say where.
Maryland doesn't, but some private organizations like the BJOC do stock brook trout in at least one MD stream. Some of them are large.I’d like to also add, MD does not stock brookies.
AFAIK, but if they've got permission for BHC, there's a chance someone could get permission for elsewhere. (Not that I think they have.)Yeah, but if I’m not mistaken, only BHC right?
the thing is, this creek is not the savage watershed, and not really western Maryland either. Seventeen inches for a brookie is a monster anywhere, let alone MD. Most fish here never get bigger than 8 inches, savage definitely has some bigger fish, but a 17 is almost impossible.Not spot burning as it is well known but the savage could have brookies that big anywhere in either the upper or lower. Above the res has pretty good sized fish, below the res is a tailwater with alot of brookies and i have caught a bunch in the 10-12' range. there have been brookies that big in NJ, but it is my understanding that the genetics are not of eastern US strain. It was a stream that was repopulated after it ran dry with a diff strain of brook trout. That stream though is on the decline and we are waiting on electroshocking results next year to see what is in it, if anything, anymore.
I have seen a photo of an approx 18 in NJ, not in the spot i posted above, from a kid who had no reason or means to fake it. I don't want to say it is real or fake because i have no clue. If someone asked me if i think this photo was possible, i would think it is. If someone asked me if it was probable, i would say no. If someone told me it came out of the savage, especially the tailwater, it becomes more probable.the thing is, this creek is not the savage watershed, and not really western Maryland either. Seventeen inches for a brookie is a monster anywhere, let alone MD. Most fish here never get bigger than 8 inches, savage definitely has some bigger fish, but a 17 is almost impossible.
With absolute certainty, no. But there are multiple tells that work more often than not, and when they all line up, you have yourself a solid educated guess.IMHO, there is no way to look at the photo and determine whether it is a wild fish or not. You can guess, but that's about it.
Do you say this because of it's size, where it was allegedly caught, or other reasons?IMHO, there is no way to look at the photo and determine whether it is a wild fish or not. You can guess, but that's about it.
My guess is that it's not.