Trout stamp

Would you agree with the generalization made about chub and sucker anglers earlier in the thread?

I’m assuming that your gear is shoddy and cheap. Is that the case?
lmao its not too far off. I dont use traditional trout flies much and my gear isn't top of the line but it's still good. I'd say intermediate. Orvis Clearwater setup for main fishing. Frogg togg hellbender waders with simms boots. Upgrading waders this spring and getting a new sling pack.
 
Keep coming up with those ideas and they are going to offer you the executive director position next time it opens up.
I would graciously accept. Could I retain my role here of PAFF and the position of director, or would that be a conflict of interest? I could threaten you guys with stocking your favorite wild trout waters if you don't get in line!

I'm kidding!
 
And another 3 pages of posts beaching over the same miniscule $16.

The 12 pack some of you keep in the vehicle for after fishing costs more and that occurs per trip!
I don't think it's the 15$ people care about, it's the idea of having to pay extra to enjoy something that existed long before the PFBC. It's not important enough to make people break the law in defiance, it just doesn't make sense. I think it points to larger issues regarding the PFBC and what their priorities are.
 
I don't think it's the 15$ people care about, it's the idea of having to pay extra to enjoy something that existed long before the PFBC. It's not important enough to make people break the law in defiance, it just doesn't make sense. I think it points to larger issues regarding the PFBC and what their priorities are.
I think to the people that honestly care, yes, and some other reasons too. I'm sure wild trout purists loathe the idea of being forced to support a system that hinders their fish populations today more than making them robust.
 
An a la carte license where a purchaser could pick & choose is unmanageable on so many levels.

I know more than a few folks that don't trout fish at all so they don't buy a trout stamp. Conversely I also know a few who almost only trout fish, pretty much exclusively ONLY on stocked streams.

The former doesn't care about the stamps because they don't need one.

The latter buys their stamp but at the same time doesn't complain about the percentage of their regular license fees that go to stocking bass, muskellunge, walleye, channel catfish, panfish, etc.

Then you have the "never stockers" group... 🙄
 
I'm sure wild trout purists loathe the idea of being forced to support a system that hinders their fish populations today more than making them robust.
It doesn't bother me much at all, considering I'm an admitted wild trout snob. A mandatory $15 Trout Stamp doesn't keep me up at night. I get too much enjoyment from my trout fishing to let it bug me, especially since I can't change it.
 
The elephant in the room here is that you could never enforce this. Too many mixed stocked + wild waters.
That's not true.
It wouldn't be at all, are you in the section that is stocked and do you have a stamp if you are? Approved trout waters have limits.

What am I not understanding?
What would make it hard to enforce?
 
Last edited:
Since pheasants were mentioned, I think it only fair to state that the technical name I call pheasants is "Ditch Chickens".

Many, many fox and owls look forward to ditch chicken stocking days.
 
I would strongly support only stocking as many trout as can be covered by the cost of the trout stamp.
Under that scenario, which two regions of Pa, using PFBC law enforcement regional lines, do you think would take the biggest hits with respect to the reductions in the total number of adult trout allocated to those regions if regional stamp sales, adjusted upward for opening day cross regional angler counts, determined those regions’ allocations?
 
Last edited:
It doesn't bother me much at all, considering I'm an admitted wild trout snob. A mandatory $15 Trout Stamp doesn't keep me up at night. I get too much enjoyment from my trout fishing to let it bug me, especially since I can't change it.
So am I but I dislike it and know others that do🤷
Everyone is different but they are out there
 
I don't think it's the 15$ people care about, it's the idea of having to pay extra to enjoy something that existed long before the PFBC. It's not important enough to make people break the law in defiance, it just doesn't make sense. I think it points to larger issues regarding the PFBC and what their priorities are.
Thank you! I’ll gladly wear the title of “Wild trout snob” with pride and continue to do my part by banking stockers I catch in wild/non stocked waterways. Together we can strive toward a world where the PFBC spends license money on worthwhile causes such as fixing the POS boat ramp at Buckingham that swallows my trailer every trip.
 
Thank you! I’ll gladly wear the title of “Wild trout snob” with pride and continue to do my part by banking stockers I catch in wild/non stocked waterways. Together we can strive toward a world where the PFBC spends license money on worthwhile causes such as fixing the POS boat ramp at Buckingham that swallows my trailer every trip.
License money is not spent on boat ramps except perhaps in the case of the Lake Erie and tribs permit depending upon how access is defined. Your boat registration moneys, not your fishing license dollars, go toward boat ramps. Fisheries and Boating have two separate funds and funding sources.
 
Actually it might, a box full of flies with broken off hooks shows an attempt NOT to catch, take, kill or remove.
I’m pretty sure smiths
Under that scenario, which two regions of Pa, using PFBC law enforcement regional lines, do you think would take the biggest hits with respect to the reductions in the total number of adult trout allocated to those regions if regional stamp sales, adjusted upward for opening day cross regional angler counts, determined those regions’ allocations?
No need to pick just two, if 3.2 million is the standard the PFBC wants to keep, and they only generate 2/3 of the cost of raising 3.2 million fish, then cut production by 1/3.

But, if you’re forcing me to pick two, I’ll gladly surrender all stocked trout destined for the NC region, to give to those less fortunate.
 
That's not true.
It wouldn't be at all, are you in the section that is stocked and do you have a stamp if you are? Approved trout waters have limits.

What am I not understanding?
What would make it hard to enforce?
I guess it went over my head that it would be tied to approved waters, which makes total sense.

But then its right back to can't make everyone happy. Why can't I fish BFC or Young Women's etc when I just want to fish for the wild trout?
 
Top