For purposes of this thread, I am not referring to the special regulations sections that a few counties get stocked. I am talking about what I call a "marginal" stream, meaning it does not contain wild trout and it gets too warm for trout by late May/early June. Yet these streams still get stocked in the late winter early spring. But really, we only get 2 months max to enjoy fishing for trout in these streams.
Why? Why does the PA Fish Commission spend money on stocking a stream that the trout will only survive for 2 months max?
I was fishing a marginal stream yesterday and the water temp was 40 degrees. There was plenty of public access, lots of boulders, woody debris, curves in the stream, channels, islands, etc. All the things that make a nice stream to fish. It would have been great to have that stream stocked on December 1st instead of March 1st. If it was stocked early December, make it catch and release only up to opening day, it would give everyone who likes to fish in the winter 4 entire months to fish it, along with 2 additional months in the spring until it gets too warm. So the stocking would yield 6 months of fishing instead of 2 months.
I am sure I am missing some key points. As in, I am sure if these marginal streams were stocked in December there would be poachers who wouldn't catch and release anyway so that may be why. But it is just frustrating that Pennsylvania has all of these streams that are dead for trout by late May yet we are missing months of possible fishing if the PA Fish Commission would stock when it starts getting cold instead of stocking right before it starts getting warm.
Again, I am only talking about streams with no wild trout, no spawning, no redds etc. But if you look at the streams in Pennsylvania and the stocking list, there are just as many marginal streams if not more than wild trout streams. It just would be nice to have trout in these streams during the winter through the spring. It would help spread out angling pressure too. This time of year, the delayed harvest and wild trout streams get pounded by anglers because they are the only places with trout. Right now water temps in every stream, whether it is wild or marginal, are low enough to hold trout for many months. If there were more streams, anglers would be able to spread out and it would help the wild trout possibly not get hit as hard.
Let me know if anyone agrees or if I am totally off, which is possible. There may be things that I am forgetting.
Why? Why does the PA Fish Commission spend money on stocking a stream that the trout will only survive for 2 months max?
I was fishing a marginal stream yesterday and the water temp was 40 degrees. There was plenty of public access, lots of boulders, woody debris, curves in the stream, channels, islands, etc. All the things that make a nice stream to fish. It would have been great to have that stream stocked on December 1st instead of March 1st. If it was stocked early December, make it catch and release only up to opening day, it would give everyone who likes to fish in the winter 4 entire months to fish it, along with 2 additional months in the spring until it gets too warm. So the stocking would yield 6 months of fishing instead of 2 months.
I am sure I am missing some key points. As in, I am sure if these marginal streams were stocked in December there would be poachers who wouldn't catch and release anyway so that may be why. But it is just frustrating that Pennsylvania has all of these streams that are dead for trout by late May yet we are missing months of possible fishing if the PA Fish Commission would stock when it starts getting cold instead of stocking right before it starts getting warm.
Again, I am only talking about streams with no wild trout, no spawning, no redds etc. But if you look at the streams in Pennsylvania and the stocking list, there are just as many marginal streams if not more than wild trout streams. It just would be nice to have trout in these streams during the winter through the spring. It would help spread out angling pressure too. This time of year, the delayed harvest and wild trout streams get pounded by anglers because they are the only places with trout. Right now water temps in every stream, whether it is wild or marginal, are low enough to hold trout for many months. If there were more streams, anglers would be able to spread out and it would help the wild trout possibly not get hit as hard.
Let me know if anyone agrees or if I am totally off, which is possible. There may be things that I am forgetting.