salvelinusfontinalis wrote:
most of us are. im sure though some are not. regardless....
maybe it is just a 20 percent reduction across the board like maurice has stated in york. i still belive the APW's got more. this is simplily based on my observations. i would still like to know why the numbers are not being released for each stream.
Sure they get more...because they are put there to be harvested. Remember the other camp...the bigger one that drives most of the decision making. Harvest is the driving force behind trout farming. And trout farming is subsidized by the vast majority of trout stamp buyers. Open waters get just a few more trout over the course of a year than the Special reg areas. Keep in mind the special reg areas get an inseason and fall stocking...typically equaling the early stocking. (Preseason 800 + inseason 400 + fall 400 = 1600 fish) A similar reach of open water will get (800 preseason and 800 inseason, first week) and thats it.
Keep in mind that in the example above the 400 inseason is being supplemented by our club in an agreement made when Big Spring closed. I think you will see a greater degree of reliance on Co-op nurserys to augment the stocking numbers cut by the commission in the future. Look at the Breeches, Clarks, anywhere there is a Co-op, folks are crabby about the numbers coming off the trucks. Because in the past the numbers of fish in the creeks were HUGELY inflated. I believe they are relying mor on them now. I hope I am wrong, maybe Mike can clear this up .
Bottom line is the special reg areas got the same cuts as a matter of percentage and if the fish are not spread out, don't blame the commission. It is up to the users to do this. like it or not.
Maurice