GANGGREEN
Active member
- Joined
- May 26, 2016
- Messages
- 176
I see all of this as a slippery slope and that's the way the "stock over the Class A streams guys" want it to be. Cowley Run should never be stocked, nor should any of the other Class A streams in this state (not to mention a fair number of streams that are NOT Class A and still support very fine populations of trout). It would be different if the PFBC had no data on some of these streams and it was simply thought that they were good wild trout streams, but in most cases, the PFBC knows damn well that these are good wild trout streams that not only don't need any additional trout dumped in, but which are being hurt by that practice. Stop it already!
Not to disagree too vehemently with Roofin' Trouter or anyone else here, but I absolutely DO think there should be certain lines in the sand which are never crossed and stocking over a current Class A is one of those lines (and I know that they've been doing it for years, but that's not a good enough reason to turn a blind eye).
Not to disagree too vehemently with Roofin' Trouter or anyone else here, but I absolutely DO think there should be certain lines in the sand which are never crossed and stocking over a current Class A is one of those lines (and I know that they've been doing it for years, but that's not a good enough reason to turn a blind eye).
Last edited: