T
troutbert
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2006
- Messages
- 10,767
Lets go back to the beginning for a moment. Stonefly’s original post said:
“PFBC will take opposing views to presnt what they say is science when it suits its purpose. For instance when making a presentationa few years ago we heard how C & R regs, notably in brookie streams increased the populations significantly.”
I posted this Question for Stone Fly.
Re: "What stream or streams did they say that C&R regs increased brook trout populations significantly?”
This question was never answered. Did the PFBC ever actually say that? Stone_Fly are you out there? Could you clear this up for me?
“PFBC will take opposing views to presnt what they say is science when it suits its purpose. For instance when making a presentationa few years ago we heard how C & R regs, notably in brookie streams increased the populations significantly.”
I posted this Question for Stone Fly.
Re: "What stream or streams did they say that C&R regs increased brook trout populations significantly?”
This question was never answered. Did the PFBC ever actually say that? Stone_Fly are you out there? Could you clear this up for me?