[quote:
You have to sell a lot of fly tying materials to make money.
Think of the overhead - each "package" - 1/2 to 3/4 is cost, then there is labor, and considering that each package is usually a couple bucks, most fly shops make little money off tying.
Take for instance Jonas, he only carries the basics, because he doesn't profit (it probably doesn't hurt that his customers buy flies)
However, Hille's has a huge tying selection because customers there tie there own.
quote]
A couple of things that come into play here...My first observations and disappointment are based on having been to the LL Bean home store many times and using that as my reference point. It was large and very complete with fly tying materials, countless accessories, variety of brands, and well used visual merchandising space.
Second, I don't know Jonas or his situation, but having been a head of a training team and a director of HR for retail, I can say that Bean's use of space and product selection left much to be desired. In a store of that space, it should be a destination store, which means it should have the variety of items to generate sufficient traffic. Limited product selection doesn't warrant frequent customer return visits at a mall location. Also, while tying materials may not have the best margin, they will increase the ave $ per transaction and overall profitability plus add capital. It is considered an intermediate item that will also lead to the sale of higher margin% products such as tying accessories. There was wasted space in the store from a visual merchadising aspect that could easily display tying material without detracting from thier proprietary items. This would, then, help increase their top line sale..which is the best way to increase the bottom line. Leases are done by sq foot...every space is valuable. Even if materials adds only a few % increase, I don't know many stores these days that would reject a 2% increase in sales.
Carrying tying materials would help increase $ per square foot, increase foot traffic, increase $per average sale, encourage sales of larger items, and lastly add margin $.
One company I worked for was based soley on the bottom line, not top line sales. It generated 60% of it's bottom line from only 20 products. 80% of it's bottom line was from the top 200 products. It carried about 1000 more products in the stores which accounted for remaining 20%...However, the business was based (as most are) by getting people into the store. If we had only carried those top 20 or 200 items and not some of those lower magin items, we would not have generated the close to the traffic or sales that we did.
I am guessing that Jonas is a small store and does not have the capital to tie up in the lower margin items...that is fine. I know that Bean does have the capital and could do a better job with the location they selected at Ross Park Mall.