Mike wrote:
There is no market for such material. In both projects of which I am aware sediments could only be trucked to areas of high ground that were near-by. In one case the property was an adjacent farm and in the other it was a farm about a half mile away.
troutbert wrote:
Mike wrote:
There is no market for such material. In both projects of which I am aware sediments could only be trucked to areas of high ground that were near-by. In one case the property was an adjacent farm and in the other it was a farm about a half mile away.
There is a large market for topsoil, potting soil, for landscaping, nurseries, for homeowner projects, etc.
Why could legacy sediment not be used for that? Is there some negative ingredient in the legacy sediment that prevents that?
The people who produce such topsoil products, where do they get it? Do they just "mine" it from prime farmland, leaving a ruined landscape with its soil stripped away?
moon1284 wrote:
In reality, sediment alone is good for next to nothing. It is all fines, it stinks, and it's not a good medium to grow anything. There is a lot of work required to make it useful.
Trees grow well on legacy sediment.
In many places trees have come in on their on in legacy sediment.
And above the McCoy Access on Spring Creek, the trees you see growing there are on legacy sediment.
On the left side looking up, that was planted by an outfit hired by Clearwater Conservancy and the survival is very high and the growth rate is very good.
On the right side it was planted by TU volunteers, using smaller tree stock. The survival was not quite as good, but still decent. And there are volunteer trees coming in as well.
The big black willow trees on the right side downstream from the bend at the gas station grew on the legacy sediment before the dam was removed.
The Stroud stream research place did a study on whether planted trees would grow on legacy sediment and found that they grow very well. I heard some people involved in buffers kind of chuckling that they even did a study about this, because they already knew this because they had seen it in many places.
The narrator calls it loam, and I think that's right. Lancaster County is famous as one of the most productive farmland areas in the world. Maybe if they marketed it as Lancaster County Legacy Soil they could get a good price.
larkmark wrote:
lyco- All I can say about the plantings is that if I go upstream or downstream from the improved areas many of the grasses and other plants are nothing like the ones in the improved area. The things growing there are not plants I encounter in my travels on any other areas streams either. The plants look like things I have seen planted around shopping centers or developments. They may be native to the United States but they sure don't look like things I see around here. I am mainly speaking about the grasses but some of the planted flowers certainly are not wild. I also saw plenty of Honeysuckle bushes (not the vine) which I have heard is an invasive plant.