![Maurice](/data/avatars/m/0/27.jpg?1640368480)
Maurice
Administrator
Staff member
Ya either need a longer net handle or do like I do and yank em into the shallows and get in front of them, wrestle them into submission.
Seriously, unless you are catching 20” fish I ain’t buying the “rod length makes a difference”argument. And then I say longer is better. It cushions the abrupt surges and runs to also helps a bit to get the rod below the fish’s head when downstream to apply side pressure. In addition during a quick run toward you it can pick up line faster than a 9 footer.
I don’t see a downfall to the 10’ rod for steelheading or landing big fish. Plus, when nymphing it is a great advantage reaching across currents and mending.
So focus your rod length on catching the fish first, then consider the landing downfalls if any.
My set up is a 10’ 7wt and 10’ 6 weight. I far prefer them over the 9’ 7 wt I started with. But it was a tip flex and I used to break fish off trying to turn them, just not so much anymore.
Seriously, unless you are catching 20” fish I ain’t buying the “rod length makes a difference”argument. And then I say longer is better. It cushions the abrupt surges and runs to also helps a bit to get the rod below the fish’s head when downstream to apply side pressure. In addition during a quick run toward you it can pick up line faster than a 9 footer.
I don’t see a downfall to the 10’ rod for steelheading or landing big fish. Plus, when nymphing it is a great advantage reaching across currents and mending.
So focus your rod length on catching the fish first, then consider the landing downfalls if any.
My set up is a 10’ 7wt and 10’ 6 weight. I far prefer them over the 9’ 7 wt I started with. But it was a tip flex and I used to break fish off trying to turn them, just not so much anymore.