willscreek
Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2009
- Messages
- 121
Would powerbait work on the famous limestone streams here in southcentral PA? I personally think very poorly of that crap but I must admit that it works on uneducated trout.
chromefinder wrote:
The bait / scent guys are going to win every-time. It's not even open for debate unless were talking about a dry on top.
willscreek wrote:
The downside to a fly is for me anyhow, a freshly stocked trout will go for powerbait or something along that type of thing instead of my offering.
PennKev wrote:
Not true.
Few fresh stocked fish will pass up a well presented hares ear, wooley bugger, etc. They are conditioned to try to eat anything that drifts by them.
The question comes up on the board from time to time, "What flies should I use for stocked trout?" My answer is always the same: The same flies you'd use if the fish weren't stocked. If you have the typical hare's ears, prince nymphs, pheasant tails, and caddis you can catch stocked trout and lots of them with little need for any other patterns. Then, when you fish a wild trout stream you'll be well prepared for that too.
Kev
Grey wrote:
PennKev wrote:
Not true.
Few fresh stocked fish will pass up a well presented hares ear, wooley bugger, etc. They are conditioned to try to eat anything that drifts by them.
The question comes up on the board from time to time, "What flies should I use for stocked trout?" My answer is always the same: The same flies you'd use if the fish weren't stocked. If you have the typical hare's ears, prince nymphs, pheasant tails, and caddis you can catch stocked trout and lots of them with little need for any other patterns. Then, when you fish a wild trout stream you'll be well prepared for that too.
Kev
I don't know about that. Granted, most any trout under water will take the patterns that you mentioned. But, year after year after year I fool many more stocked trout with bright, gaudy patterns like eggs, weenies and worms than I do with the natural stuff. Especially over the freshly stocked, soft mouth variety.
And when they are really new to the stream, try swinging those patterns. Screw the dead drift.
PennKev wrote:
I think it's all a matter of what you have confidence in. The actual patterns seems to matter very little in my experience. If YOU are convinced you need tie a bunch of freakish looking flies to catch stockies, go for it. I'm not, so I don't. Year after year I spend several days in the early season catching stocked fish one after another with nothing more than typical classic nymph patterns. Find the fish, get a good drift, hook fish, repeat.
Heck I don't even get very crazy with steelhead flies. My suckerspawn are usually pastel or subdued shades... ...when I use them! Give me a box of hares ears in natural and black, and a few yellow, peach, and cream SS and I'm good to go. Steelhead get way too much credit for being selective to color of pattern in my opinion. And on days when they do seem to be picky, I find the small dark or natural colored nymphs are the flies that work anyway.
I have total confidence in the patterns I mentioned in my previous post. I'm just not one of those guys that buys into the idea that you need a bunch of specific flies whether it is to match hatches or having a selection of gaudy paterns. If anything size is important and I'd rather have several sizes of a single pattern than several different patterns.
Kev
quillfly wrote:
best stocker fly for me has always been the spun deer hair pellet
hook (any egg or caddis or curved emerger )
tread (the one you use the least, have most , have on bobbin at time)
entire fly-deer hair clip to resemble pellet
when asked on stream state it is a midge cluster pattern similar to GG 🙂🙂