![bigjohn58](/data/avatars/m/0/174.jpg?1640368481)
bigjohn58
Active member
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2006
- Messages
- 1,355
What style of dry fly do most of you fish with? Catskill, comparadun, parachute, etc? For certain species of flies do you prefer a certain style?
pcray1231 wrote:
I use comparaduns sparingly, but I do use them. Their main advantage is that I think they can represent an emerger, dun, and spinner all at the same time. This works like a charm on easier fish, especially for hatches of the swimming nymph variety like sulphers since the nymphs swim to the surface and transform in the film. Tougher fish, though, it doesn't work so well for ANY of the life stages. And on different types of nymphs (for example, MB's), it doesn't work for the emerger stage since they tend to transform to duns on the bottom. So it depends on the hatch and pickiness of the fish a bit.
Foxgap239 wrote:
Comparaduns all the way. Tied with deer hair wings down to 18 and CDC wings for smaller. Not sure the last time I used anything but for mayflies. Caddis and midges would be a different story, of course.
pcray1231 wrote:
You mentioned in the Douple worm thread about confidence in a fly. I don't like that. We all may be a little better with one thing than another, and that's where it comes from. But I think it becomes a crutch that prevents us from figuring out the ideal for the situation, and learning how to catch fish on other things. All flies have a time and place.
bigjohn58 wrote:
I do not even own a comparadun. I fish a lot of Parachutes and catskills. Just my opinion I feel a parachute resembles a fly better then a comparadun. I don't see how the fan of deer hair looks like legs and wings where a parachute with some feather fibers and the parachute looks like legs and the wings. I tie all mine with 2 or 3 seperate microfiber tails and never tie a clump of feather fibers for a tail like a traditional catskill. I also feel like a catskill fly works for certain species that do not ride low on the water film.