![djmyers](/data/avatars/m/0/854.jpg?1640368487)
djmyers
Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2007
- Messages
- 288
TUNA wrote:
Very nice, maybe something less bouyant than hair, to get it down? I would use the way it is though. It looks like it would come alive in the water as well.
http://www.midcurrent.com/articles/flies/likakis_muddlers.aspx
At each step of the evolutionary path, the complexity of the pattern increased. And (usually) the density of the deer-hair head increased as well. The original pattern with its sparse head is long forgotten, and few fly fishers would pay money for one. Indeed, they demand Muddlers with tightly packed heads.
jayL wrote:
techniques that I have fussed with.
gfen wrote:
Too much work.
jayL wrote:
You tie royal wulffs.
And I always had trouble with that word. Remember that the root is "buoy" as in lobster buoy and you got it.
bam wrote:
Do you have any hooks toward the back of the fly? If not I could see a lot of missed strikes if you're chasing trout...
Otherwise, looks like something I need in my box!
bam wrote:
Do you have any hooks toward the back of the fly? If not I could see a lot of missed strikes if you're chasing trout...
Otherwise, looks like something I need in my box!