![gfen](/data/avatars/m/0/697.jpg?1640368481)
gfen
Active member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2007
- Messages
- 6,639
Also sounds like it works opposite of what would be ideal. The reason it exists is that you put your focal plane and subject plane on the same level, and maximize depth of field from a minimum f/stop.
The artiste crowd understands the inverse is possible, if you tilt them OUT of alignment, you can mimize DoF even further by intentionally cutting back your focal plane... Like those bumps you see on Adult Swim at night.
I'd be impressed by the former, I'm not so impressed by the latter.![Smile :) :)]()
The artiste crowd understands the inverse is possible, if you tilt them OUT of alignment, you can mimize DoF even further by intentionally cutting back your focal plane... Like those bumps you see on Adult Swim at night.
I'd be impressed by the former, I'm not so impressed by the latter.