The OP’s question about stocking. There are currently university fishery science experts, non govermental organizations, federal agencies, volunteer conservationists, and anglers calling out PA fish and boat for their irresponsible stoxking practices and advocating for stocking reform. Welcome to the club.
The way to get stocking stopped is two fold
1. Pointing out that the species their stocking are invasive and tons of scientific data showing harms to native fish all over the globe. Simply saying “don’t stock over wild trout” is very ineffective because “wild trout are not listed in the state action plan as a species of greatest conservation need. There is no obligation to protect “wild trout” as per their duty as a resource manager. Its something they do because its popular. They are obligated to protect sensitive, threatened, or endangered species because if they don’t and things go south the feds step in eventually when it gets bad enough. The invasive effect on native species is the angle we must take because it comes WITH the data to back it FROM fisheries science experts and species of greatest conservation need is a funded deliverable for PFBC from grants/ future RAWA money most likely coming ect.
2. You need people actually taking this angle and pushing it. This is where we are comiing up short. Not short on data, solutions or good reasons. Frankly there are a lot of cynical people who sit on their a**es. If they told their neighbors/friends, called their reps, spoke out publically we could most likely get this done.
If the stocking frustrates you grab an Oar and row the boat on number 2 above, thats where your needed and why I won’t shut up about this topic. Financial and ecological incompetence will continue to hide in plain sight until we bring this to non anglers, hikers/bikers, bird watchers, naturalists, kyakers, rock climbers, anyone with a connection to the outdoors who we canget to give a you know what, call out waste, fraud, and abuse, and contact their legislators.