threat to upper Spring Creek-public hearing

nymphingmaniac

nymphingmaniac

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
1,167
Location
State College
From Spring Creek TU:

Hanson Aggregates has requested a permit modification to allow mining an additional 200’ deeper in their Oak Hall quarry, immediately adjacent to Spring Creek. The proposed modification does not change the areal extent of mining, only the depth. The proposed mining depth would place the bottom of the quarry much further below Spring Creek than it already is.

The increased depth, combined with the proximity to Spring Creek, may present concerns relative to the cold-water health of Spring Creek. Consequently, the Spring Creek Chapter of Trout Unlimited is interested in monitoring the issue and providing responsible input as necessary.

For anyone who is interested in learning more about the issue, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection will hold a public hearing about the proposed permit modification. The public hearing will be held on Friday, January 27, 2017 at the Mount Nittany Middle School, 656 Brandywine Drive, State College, PA 16801, beginning at 6:30pm.

The hearing will open with a brief presentation describing Hanson's proposal and explaining the permit revision process and opportunities for public participation. Those wishing to provide oral testimony at the hearing will be required to sign-up at the beginning of the meeting and will be limited to a maximum of 5 minutes of testimony. Written comments may also be submitted at the hearing for DEP review.
 
From statecollege.com:

COLLEGE TOWNSHIP — Some residents who live near the Oak Hall Quarry are petitioning for a public hearing on an application by the quarry’s operators to extend its depth by 200 feet.

They say they’re concerned about blasting at the limestone quarry off Boalsburg Road and particularly the impact the deeper mining could have on Spring Creek.

“We have major concerns about the way a deeper quarry will affect ground water and possible subsidence and formation of sink holes,” said Lemont resident James Marden.

Hanson Aggregates Pennsylvania LLC has applied to the state Department of Environmental Protection Moshannon District Mining Office in Philipsburg to revise its permits. According to a public legal notice, the application includes a request to increase the depth of mining at the quarry 200 feet below the existing approved pit floor elevation. The proposed permit area involves 315 acres. The current permit area is 331 acres.

A spokesman for Lehigh Hanson, the Irving, Texas-based U.S. parent company of the quarry operator, said the company has done “extensive hydrologic testing” which focused on ensuring “there would not be depletion or adverse impacts on Spring Creek.”

“There is not going to be any additional impact beyond what we’re doing now,” said Jeff Sieg, director of corporate communications for Lehigh Hanson.

CREEK ‘TREMENDOUSLY IMPORTANT’

Steve Sywensky, a Lemont resident and owner of Flyfisher’s Paradise in State College, said Spring Creek is “arguably the best trout stream in Pennsylvania.” It brings tourists to the area from across the state, the Northeast and beyond, he said.

The creek is “tremendously important” as an economic and ecological resource, Sywensky said, noting that among other things it helps clean the Chesapeake Bay.

“Do we need to have potential impact on Spring Creek so that Hanson quarry can mine deeper? I think not.”

Marden sent a letter requesting a public hearing to the Moshannon District Mining Office on Dec. 5.

“In particular, I would like information addressing my concerns about the way a cone of depression created by dewatering of a deeper quarry at this site may affect sinkhole formation and the flow of water in Spring Creek, which runs immediately adjacent to this quarry,” he wrote.

Because the quarry floor is already below stream level and under this revised permit would extend much deeper, the danger is that water from the stream will flow into the quarry pit and need to be pumped back to the stream, Marden told the Gazette. In that case, any pause in pumping could cause all of the stream water to flow into the quarry, leaving the streambed to run dry. As such, the flow of Spring Creek may become dependent on the uninterrupted operation of a quarry pump, he said.

As an example of the potential danger, Marden cited ongoing issues, including damage to roads and bridges, involving Bushkill Creek near Easton, which drains into a nearby quarry pit. (Hanson is not involved in that operation.)

Lehighvalleylive.com reported in 2013 that when another quarry operator’s pumps stopped working during a power failure, portions of the creek dried up and fish died.

Marden also cited a map from the state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources showing numerous surface depressions and a few sinkholes in the area near the Oak Hall Quarry.

“One possible outcome of increased quarrying activity in Oak Hall is new subsidence beneath the Mount Nittany Expressway, which according to the map runs directly over one surface depression,” Marden said.

Marden, a professor of biology at Penn State, noted that he was speaking as a concerned resident who has used his training as a scientist to research the matter, but that this is not his area of professional expertise.

PETITION DRIVE

Resident Sue Smith has organized a petition drive calling for the DEP to hold a public hearing on the application. Smith said she had already submitted two or three petitions with 10 names and had distributed about 50 other petitions to interested residents so they could each collect 10 signatures. The deadline for submission to the DEP is Monday, Dec. 19.

“The scary thing is if they would hit a sinkhole Spring Creek would go right into the hole and there would be no more Spring Creek. It’s a very serious, serious thing,” Smith said.

She said she is also concerned about blasting and its impact on neighboring homes.

“Everybody who lives in Lemont has been affected by the blasting,” she said, noting issues such as cracks in walls and windows rattling.

Smith said she worries that “if they’re going 200 feet lower, that’s going to be a heck of a lot of blasting.”

Sywensky said that “Every time they take a major shot at the quarry, I can feel it in my house.”

Sieg said that while blasting is dependent on demand for limestone, he expected it generally would occur about once or twice a week. The volume in blasting and in truck traffic should be largely unchanged from current operations, he said.

“We just want to go deeper, we’re not going to expand the actual mining surface area,” Sieg said, adding, “We want to be mining and supplying stone to that market as long as possible.”

Sieg said the company, which has about 15 local employees, is open to answering residents’ questions at a hearing or at other times.

“We’re open to suggestions on how we can improve relationships with our neighbors,” he said.

Dan Spadoni, a spokesman for the DEP, said after the agency receives requests for a public hearing, one would be scheduled “in the general vicinity of the application.”

The department’s review of the application to dig 200 feet deeper considers potential impacts on groundwater, stream flow and water supplies and any proposed changes to the reclamation plan, he said.

The department has 60 days following a public hearing to notify the applicant of its decision or of the requirement to submit additional information.

The key questions are, Marden said, “What is the risk to Spring Creek and is the community willing to accept that risk?”



 
There is always a possibility of the creek water draining into the quarry, requiring the quarry to be pumped out. This WILL cause sedimentation to the creek and make the water cloudy for much of the distance down to the big spring in Bellefonte. It's not a good thing. Many other quarries have cause major impact to limestone stream, DEP has to be stopped from issuing the permit.
 
What is the current depth of the pit? It runs to about 1500 feet away from the creek. If they only allowed the depth increase on the western end away from Spring Creek would the quarry be economically viable? Have they taken core samples or done other tests to determine the structure below the current floor?

While the close proximity to the creek is a significant concern the fact that an unrelated quarry 100 miles away has had an issue should not be the sole reason to deny a permit.
 
After watching this type of activity destroy streams firsthand in the Cumberland Valley over the years, this is bad.
 
http://www.centredaily.com/news/local/article129306544.html

not much info in the story
 
Back
Top