Well, I totally agree with Brownout on nuclear.
As for Tim, the drilling issue certainly needs to be watched carefully, but I wouldn't label myself as totally against it. More in the "make sure they do it right" category, which I fear is not being done right now. The linked article is very biased, and its never a good idea to take stuff like that as the gospel.
Frankly, I don't find anything in the pictures to be all that appalling. Some pictures of the catch basins are pretty ugly, but at least its in catch basins. The orange pipe in the stream for extraction, but they're not extracting at that moment, so you don't know if they do it during high flow or not. A coon drank from the catch basin and died, big deal, its a coon.
My dad had a well go in 200 yards behind his house (not on his property, though). It really sucked during the operation, mostly noise, mud, trucks, lights, and the worst part, at all times of the night. It was a lot like the pictures, actually. But it lasted all of 2 or 3 months and they were gone, the derrick came down, the trailers towed away, the pipes disassembled, all the fluids tanked out, presumably to be treated. Landscaped the remaining areas and replanted. No garbage, nothing. The only thing that remains is the actual well, which is quiet and not all that obtrusive, just like the many other wells in the area. Deer eat daily within 10 yards of it on the new sprouts, his tree stand will actually probably go right over it. The stream that runs between the house and the drilling was not harmed at all, I went and sampled the bugs, all was as it was before the drilling. They did not flatten a whole mountainside like in that picture though, we're talking maybe an acre. They did slightly "improve" the dirt road going in.
If thats the worst of it, I have no problems with it. I worry about where, and especially when, they take the water, how the treatment is done afterwards, and whether the DEP will actually enforce regulations so that companies don't cut corners.