Swattie87
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 3, 2011
- Messages
- 5,765
Anyone have any experience with this?
Given what I’m about to recount, I think it’s safe to talk about openly, but if not, feel free to PM me.
Not on Nat Repro list, which, I found odd given its location and its more northern neighbors. Geology seems decent, at least according to what I could find. Most of the time if a stream looks/researches like it should have Trout, but isn’t listed on the Nat Repro list, I’ve found it does when I fish it. Though, I’d expect this stream to have been surveyed before at some point. Was it, and nothing was turned up?
Fished Slateford today with some, to me anyway, interesting results. Fished from the lower National Park Drive bridge to the Upper Falls. Maybe 3/5 of a mile. (Note National Park Drive is currently closed due to a partial washout, and you can’t access it from 611. You have to park at the upper trailhead lot and hike down.)
Flows were good, it’s slightly tannic, but nothing like some others nearby that fish very well still. I fished a small heavy Bugger with some shot too. Admittedly, this method in cold water doesn’t usually catch a lot of fish, but I use it when exploring new streams in Winter because it does tend to move fish, and you can get an idea about the population by noting how often you move fish.
Anyway, (I think) I moved two small fish, Browns (I think), below the first set of falls, which isn’t far up from its mouth. This falls is big enough to be impassable, if fish are repopulating from the D. Above that, I didn’t move or see a fish, despite the spectacular habitat. (See pics.) Flipped probably 50 rocks and didn’t see one bug.
I couldn’t find anything on it indicating a water quality problem. Headwaters are listed as Exceptional Value.
Me sucking is always a viable possibility, but I can usually at least move and/or see fish, even when I’m not catching them. Am I missing something here, or is this just a legit dud? If it’s a dud, anyone know why? I feel like it shouldn’t be a dud, but the objective evidence suggests it is.
Given what I’m about to recount, I think it’s safe to talk about openly, but if not, feel free to PM me.
Not on Nat Repro list, which, I found odd given its location and its more northern neighbors. Geology seems decent, at least according to what I could find. Most of the time if a stream looks/researches like it should have Trout, but isn’t listed on the Nat Repro list, I’ve found it does when I fish it. Though, I’d expect this stream to have been surveyed before at some point. Was it, and nothing was turned up?
Fished Slateford today with some, to me anyway, interesting results. Fished from the lower National Park Drive bridge to the Upper Falls. Maybe 3/5 of a mile. (Note National Park Drive is currently closed due to a partial washout, and you can’t access it from 611. You have to park at the upper trailhead lot and hike down.)
Flows were good, it’s slightly tannic, but nothing like some others nearby that fish very well still. I fished a small heavy Bugger with some shot too. Admittedly, this method in cold water doesn’t usually catch a lot of fish, but I use it when exploring new streams in Winter because it does tend to move fish, and you can get an idea about the population by noting how often you move fish.
Anyway, (I think) I moved two small fish, Browns (I think), below the first set of falls, which isn’t far up from its mouth. This falls is big enough to be impassable, if fish are repopulating from the D. Above that, I didn’t move or see a fish, despite the spectacular habitat. (See pics.) Flipped probably 50 rocks and didn’t see one bug.
I couldn’t find anything on it indicating a water quality problem. Headwaters are listed as Exceptional Value.
Me sucking is always a viable possibility, but I can usually at least move and/or see fish, even when I’m not catching them. Am I missing something here, or is this just a legit dud? If it’s a dud, anyone know why? I feel like it shouldn’t be a dud, but the objective evidence suggests it is.