"Re-wilding a River" - nice read

geebee

geebee

Active member
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
2,512
I totally pinched this off FFINH, its a nice read and I think a lot of us would share the sentiment :

To Re-Wild a River
(BHA members discover hidden gems – and valuable habitat – in the backcountry of the White Mountains)
Dan Williams

Trout fishing in many parts of New England is a zero-sum game. High water temperatures and low dissolved oxygen levels often leave streams barren of salmonids – until the stocking trucks show up each spring. When they do, an army of anglers, using every conceivable form of tackle, descend on these waters and proceed to pull out chunky triploid rainbows, browns and brookies, most destined for the freezer. The “lucky ones” that get away face an increasingly difficult battle for survival as waters warm into the summer. Most will not survive. None will reproduce, leaving rivers empty by fall foliage season. The process repeats itself year after year.

Contrast that with the mid-July day I had on the water recently with two friends and fellow BHA members. Corey Ellis, Tovar Cerulli and I spent the better part of a day in New Hampshire’s White Mountain National Forest fly fishing for native brook trout on the Wildcat River. The experience was a far cry from the put-and-take scenario I described above. After driving several miles of Forest Service road, we parked at a trailhead and hiked in further, crossing two minor brooks, before the surging waters of the Wildcat beckoned us to her banks. What we found was a picture postcard scene of the New Hampshire backcountry. Nestled among a thick tangle of birch-beech-maple forest, dotted with spruce and fir of all ages, the Wildcat’s gin-clear water is studded with large granite boulders and riddled with fallen timber, making for prime trout holding water over virtually every yard of stream bed. Its relatively steep gradient and high elevation ensure a year-round, cold water environment for the fish – and made it quite easy to regulate our body temperatures as we wet-waded through the warm, humid, July day.

“First fish buys the beer afterwards,” yelled Corey above the din of the raging waters as I headed off downstream after rigging up my “minnow pole” – a 6’6”, 2-weight with a leader that proved a bit too long to work with. My first cast yielded a violent strike and hearty fight from a 6-inch brookie already beginning to show signs of the vibrant colors these fish exhibit come September spawning season. I imagined how breathtaking a trip to the Wildcat in the fall would be when both the trees and the fish would be dressed in their fall palette of oranges, reds and yellows.

As we continued downstream every boulder, every logjam, every plunge pool presented us with new opportunities. And virtually every pool and run teemed with trout, all more than eager to smack our dry flies without much regard to pattern, size or color. There were no empty worm containers, tangles of monofilament on tree branches, or cigarette butts. There weren’t even any footprints save for those of moose and other wildlife. In this pristine setting, with the trout happy to indulge us, it became clear to me how fragile such a fishery is. It would be far too easy for a few anglers to fish out this small stream if they were to start keeping their catch, even with New Hampshire’s rather conservative five fish per day limit.

As we sat on giant granite boulders to eat our lunch, Corey, Tovar and I discussed what the future holds for the Wildcat, and perhaps other streams in this region. Recently, BHA-New England partnered with a local Trout Unlimited chapter and other groups to draft a proposal to designate the Wildcat River as a water “Managed for Wild Trout” (MWT). This would include regulations limiting angling to catch-and-release, fly-fishing only with single, barbless hooks. There is no better candidate for “re-wilding” than the Wildcat. NH Fish and Game has recorded a biomass of 44 pounds per acre of wild trout – far exceeding the 13 pounds per acre minimum for MWT designation. Jackson Falls, on the lower reaches of the Wildcat, provides a convenient barrier to keep stocked trout in its lower stretch from mixing with wild fish. Currently, hatchery trout are stocked above the falls and are only prevented from reaching the upper Wildcat by the area’s relative remoteness. Situated in the heart of the White Mountains, the Wildcat benefits from the longest-lasting snowpack anywhere east of the Mississippi, and already claims the designation “Wild and Scenic River” from the federal government.

It is somewhat puzzling that although the White Mountain region provides the highest quality wild trout habitat in New Hampshire, none of its rivers and streams are managed for wild trout. This fact seems to contradict a recent angler survey that showed a majority favor more wild trout waters in the state. And there is already precedent for managing certain streams for wild trout, as NH F&G has had success doing so elsewhere in New Hampshire. Also, since managing for wild trout is more cost-effective than put-and-take, and given its location in the heart of the largest mountain tourist area in the northeast, the economic benefits for an MWT designation on the Wildcat seem like a no-brainer.
After lunch, we explored a little further upstream on “The ‘Cat.” Then Corey suggested we hike out and drive back downstream to check out its lower reaches. What we found there was more akin to put-and-take. The water was still gin-clear, but quite a bit warmer. The streambed was a bit more flat, with fewer quality holding areas for fish. Footprints and the detritus from previous anglers were easy to spot, and trout were hard to find. We did manage a few strikes and one 10-inch brook trout which, from its appearance, was clearly raised in a hatchery.

New Hampshire has both a robust put-and-take fishery and an effective wild trout program. It makes sense to include the Wildcat – and perhaps other White Mountain streams – in the latter group. One could spend an entire summer in the White Mountain region exploring the many mountain streams and have new water to fish every day. And all this on National Forest land fully open to the public. Other wild trout waters from New England to Georgia are proof that you can re-wild a river. If NH F&G were to shift its focus toward re-wilding and away from put-and-take in the White Mountain region, rivers like the Wildcat – and anglers who fish there – would reap the benefits for generations to come.

first published in Backcountry Journal so all copyright etc to them

cheers

Mark.
 
I spent the summer doing angler surveys for NJ Div of Fish and Wildlife in streams with good wild trout populations, so I have my own take on the wild/stocked debate. Yes, a little more than half of anglers profess to prefer wild trout, but only 1/6 are capable of catching wild trout on a regular basis - at least in heavily to moderately fished streams where the wild fish get "smart". Therefore, most anglers depend on stocked fish to have a good catch rate. When asked if they would support lower stocking rates, all but the most ardent wild trout fishers replied they would like to see stocking increased.

On the positive side, about 60% of anglers now practice catch and release and half of the keep anglers only keep a fish or two for lunch or dinner rather than fill a stringer. Where I worked fish held over well all summer as a result.
 
It would be a great idea to quit stocking over brook trout in that stream and many others.

The type of person who reads that type of publication is extremely likely to already agree with that idea, even before reading the article.

But the question is: How do you get stocking ended on that stream, and others?

The article doesn't discuss that. There is no "call to action." It doesn't say write to the NH fisheries people or Forest Service, etc.

Maybe that will come later.

 
troutbert - in paragraph 5 it states the local TU partnered with BHA (Backcountry Hunters & Anglers) to draft the proposal to the VT DFW.


a follow up post indicated that a survey on the cat gave up 183 brook trout in 100yards of stream.

cheers

Mark
 
I have had a couple of chances to fish the Wildcat river, and it shocked me to see so many quality brookies throughout the river. There is a lot of tourism in Jackson NH and in the area in general. This river seems like a prime candidate for special regulations. Both times I was there I saw other anglers and all were ff. A true gem like the Wildcat and its brookies should be afforded stewardship from its state and the ff community.
 
Playing devils advocate here a bit. I'm NEVER against C&R regulations.

But, I fail to see a problem here. The upper end is full of wild fish and not stocked and the author had a great time there. So, umm, no problem there, right? Seems to be doing just fine as it is. The author feels it'd be easy to fish out. That may or may not be true. But if it is true, it's pretty obvious that nobody is actually doing that. This area isn't stocked and regulations should be only as restrictive as they need to be to maintain a quality recreational fishery. It's working!

On the lower end, the question is whether wild trout COULD flourish. And the answer depends on whether the problem is the habitat or the fishing pressure and harvest. While I do not have personal knowledge of it's potential, the author himself states that the water there is warmer and flatter and that the holding water isn't as good. I find it very possible that if you took away harvest, the stocked fish would just die in the summer. If you took away stocking, it'd just be salmonoid free.
 
It is possible that now the stream will suffer from being outed, I don't in this theory, but many people do.
 
Nice little story.

The only part that troubles me is where the local TU chapter is pushing for FFO regulations. This comes across to me as being awfully selfish and misguided. What makes them think they have the right to exclude other anglers so they can have the place to themselves? This is a black mark on Trout Unlimited, which I've been a member of since 1979.

I'd be okay with C&R regulations that include all types of angling with no hook restrictions.

I also think the author just spot-burned the stream. Big mistake.
 
FFO? They should pushing for Heritage FFO regs!

In reality, my ultralight spin rods and I largely agree with you Frank.
 
In hindsight, I'm surprised they're not pushing for DFFO regulations...Dry Fly Fishing Only.
 
I love C&R AFLO restrictions.

I'd be okay with C&R regulations that include all types of angling with no hook restrictions.

I'm sorry but I've heard this from you before. Treble hooks , barbed hooks and bait are not nearly as good on the fish as a single debarred hook on an AFL.
That said I'm ok with some all tackle catch and release too.
We just plain need more special regs
 
Gee, Frank, why come back to the fly-fishing board like this? I know you're a "good guy," but why stir up things on a fly-fishing site?

For all: Having said that to Frank, I fish a number of anything goes wild trout streams, and after the ending of stocking back in the '80s, most of their trout populations expanded. The limiting factor seems to be the harvest of trout by those who do not practice c/r, but 80% of those who fish these waters now are c/r anglers, whether fly-, lure-, or bait-fishermen. So, I guess I'm saying be careful what you wish for. All kinds of anglers can fish relatively harmoniously on waters that produce wild trout, and sometimes special regs draw large numbers of anglers who are more detrimental to the water than the types of fishermen who fish them, and sometimes large numbers of anglers do things that cause streams to get posted.
 
We don't need more special regulations. We just have to be better at applying the ones we already have.

We could even simplify everything and just get by with two.

Ability-To-Keep All Tackle (more or less ATW)

C&R All Tackle (everything else)



 
I don't think anywhere in NH there is a need for special regulations, what I think is protect the wild trout streams by halting stocking over wild fish. After that, where habitat is lacking make it better, with the caveat that it should be holistic not building habitat. The gradient are much to steep on the streams I saw in NH to be able to build anything. It simply won't last.
A few trees knocked down here and there is probably all that can be done and be effective.
 
Back
Top