Radioactive waste being discharged in Susky and Western PA rivers

afishinado

afishinado

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 11, 2006
Messages
16,220
Location
Chester County, PA
Very disconcerting article about wastewater from fracking being discharged by wastewater plants in the Susky above Harrisburg and in the Pittsburgh area rivers >

https://publicherald.org/pennsylvania-is-discharging-radioactive-fracking-waste-into-rivers-as-landfill-leachate-impacting-the-chesapeake-bay-ohio-river-watersheds/
 
(Shaking head).

Good grief.
Sounds like a fairly widespread problem. Will be interesting to hear the response from DEP/state gov on the details. Might turn out that some of these landfill operators may be in for some big fines as well.
 
If someone understands this, could they please explain it?

Fracking return water is being sent to landfills? I never heard of water being sent to landfills.

Then the water leaches out of the landfill and the leachate is sent through municipal treatment plants?

Or what?
 
The landfills** who accept unconventional drilling solids, a.k.a. fracking waste, are receiving wastes that contain high levels of Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (TENORM), mainly in the form of the radionuclides radium-226 and radium-228.

The TENORM is in the fracking solids. My guess is that they are taking dilution of the material and subsequent dilution at discharge in to account.
 
Yes, drilling solids go to the landfills. Rains leach out the soluble substances, and the leachate is sent to sewage treatment plants, which cannot process radioactive elements so they are discharged into waterways. Good job DEP. I hope everyone has a 55 gallon drum of Vaseline handy because you're going to need it.
 
radioactivity is a trigger to elicit a response from the public. May be hoping to get a few clicks or donations. The levels released are totally harmless. Most likely far below what research institutions and hospitals are allowed to discharge to waste water.
This organization has a credibility problem IMO/\.
With that said. The discharge of clay/sediment in fracking fluid is a problem for streams.
 
The Public Herald is not a reputable source for news.
 
There are plenty of articles about fracking waste being discharged in PA rivers by sewage treatment plants that are ill-equipped to handle such waste.

Here is another article on the subject >

https://www.desmogblog.com/2019/04/25/fracking-wastewater-disposal-health-pennsylvania-environmental-protection-agency

and another >

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/energy/article/EPA-weighs-allowing-oil-companies-to-pump-13303676.php

and yet another >

https://www.alleghenyfront.org/ag-investigating-wastewater-case-from-landfill-that-accepts-fracking-waste/

Plus this one >

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/10/181022135716.htm


 
When fracking water is run through a sewage plant, are there any pollutants being removed? And if so, which ones?
 
It really depends on which plant it goes to and what that plant's (permitted) capabilities are. In a general sense, a typical treatment plant will remove organics and solids. Some remove metals. The problem with frack water is the high amount of halides (chlorine Bromine etc in the form of salts) and some radioactive materials. These contaminants are essentially pass thru.

There really is no good cost effective way to remove these contaminants. Early on, fracking companies were sending this material to treatment plants, but regs and permits did not keep up with the industry. Treatment plants' permitted effluents were based on concentration, (Lbs/gal) and halides (salts) were not included in many of permits. Again pass thru.

When the CWA was reauthorised, treatment plants' effluents became regulated under TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load). No longer concentration based but "how many pounds per day" is one discharging. This took away the pass thru "dilution" capabilities of plants

As with all things, by trying to help, the gov't made things more complicated. As the regulations tightened, frackers began to recycle water causing it to become more concentrated before eventually needing to be disposed. This highly concentrated brine solution now imparts a higher TMDL to the accepting treatment plant, making it tougher and more expensive to dispose.

And so the cirlce continues.

Now think of all the road salt that is spread annually that enters the streams to put things in perspective.

 
Tigereye wrote:
It really depends on which plant it goes to and what that plant's (permitted) capabilities are. In a general sense, a typical treatment plant will remove organics and solids. Some remove metals. The problem with frack water is the high amount of halides (chlorine Bromine etc in the form of salts) and some radioactive materials. These contaminants are essentially pass thru.

There really is no good cost effective way to remove these contaminants. Early on, fracking companies were sending this material to treatment plants, but regs and permits did not keep up with the industry. Treatment plants' permitted effluents were based on concentration, (Lbs/gal) and halides (salts) were not included in many of permits. Again pass thru.

When the CWA was reauthorised, treatment plants' effluents became regulated under TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load). No longer concentration based but "how many pounds per day" is one discharging. This took away the pass thru "dilution" capabilities of plants

As with all things, by trying to help, the gov't made things more complicated. As the regulations tightened, frackers began to recycle water causing it to become more concentrated before eventually needing to be disposed. This highly concentrated brine solution now imparts a higher TMDL to the accepting treatment plant, making it tougher and more expensive to dispose.

And so the cirlce continues.

Now think of all the road salt that is spread annually that enters the streams to put things in perspective.

^Very informative. Thanks for the info, TE.
 
Another article about fracking waste and where it ends up in PA >

https://paenvironmentdaily.blogspot.com/2019/09/earthworks-new-report-interactive-map.html?fbclid=IwAR1YVmyrKvIel95HZZRmNKPg9QTiH2m29Xc3HRs9WXq2E_Zp_KAY0_I3kK8
 
Let's do what we have been doing for hundreds of years. Let Maryland deal with it. The Ocean, the final great Dumping Grounds!
 
salvelinus wrote:
Yes, drilling solids go to the landfills. Rains leach out the soluble substances, and the leachate is sent to sewage treatment plants, which cannot process radioactive elements so they are discharged into waterways. Good job DEP. I hope everyone has a 55 gallon drum of Vaseline handy because you're going to need it.

The irony of you recommending everyone have a 55 gallon drum of a certain derivative of oil refining because of a petroleum industry issue did not escape me.
 
Back
Top