Lots of new habitat in some SE Pa small wild trout streams

Mike

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
5,693
Since the 4” closely followed by the 5”-6” rainfall in Lehigh and Northampton Co’s, as well as that second storm covering most SE Pa counties, I have been intentionally biking roads along streams as much as possible observing the flows, damage, and new habitat features, covering around 225 mi since the storms.

The visibility and freedom to stop or creep along almost anywhere provided by biking has it advantages when looking over embankments, etc. Streams sure got a good physic. Substrate surfaces are quite clean (too clean) in a lot of stretches, indicating that tremendous scouring occurred. A substantial, temporary loss of macroinvertebrate biomass undoubtedly accompanied the scouring through flushing and crushing.

There are certainly a lot of new undercuts, expanded point bars causing new or additional bank erosion opposite the rubble/gravel bars, and runs where there were formerly riffles. Most impressive though are the numbers of previously felled trees and logs 12-18 inches in diameter that were apparently picked up and transported along and across the flood plains by the very rare, high flows to positions where they then resettled across the streams with water now tumbling over and shooting under them. These trees have drilled some very nice new holes in formerly shallow stream bottoms, creating some great habitat for moderate to larger size trout in streams that were undoubtedly dominated by small trout due to habitat constraints. During the time of the flooding, these small streams became the sizes of typical medium to large warmwater streams where permitted by flood plain width. Having spent much of my life on, in, or around water I am still impressed by its power.
 
Do you think people will leave the trees in the streams, or pull them out?

If there weren't trees in the streams before this event, it's probably because people are in the habit of removing fallen trees from streams.

 
Road crews typically remove them from areas around bridges. What happens elsewhere, such as in woodlots away from any manicured properties or infrastructure is anybody’s guess.
 
Walked a mile of the 10-20 yd wide Jordan today that I typically fish. The 30-40 yard long, flat pools have lost considerable depth due to sand and gravel deposits, but the wider, shallow riffles have greatly improved for nymphing. If things remain as they are, stocking points in these popular pools will be abandoned by a good percentage of the trout stocked there next spring. New and substantial cobble deposits have taken up 40 percent of the stream width and much of the depth in the formerly shallow riffs, however, forcing that water toward the opposite bank and forming a channel with much better depth. This will be particularly welcomed in low flow periods. Also of note is that most of the felled trees are gone and log jams are a lot bigger in the same locations as in the past.
 
Only SMB in the Jordan, but just prior to the floods there was a Golden RT in one larger, spring-fed pool.
 
Top