B
Broad_Top
Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2011
- Messages
- 96
Does anyone take more care on this the smaller the size you go for a given pattern?
I lost some fish last year that I didn't think I should have, so naturally I decided to blame the hooks I used for a given size. That's to say, This year, instead of going down in hook gape (actual size), I'm going to go smaller on the shank first instead.
Example: If I currently tie a given nymph pattern in a 14 1x long shank and a 16 1x long shank, I'm now going to tie the 16 size on a 14 regular shank.
I've heard hook proportions talked about on here in terms of what creates a better hook set, but don't recall specifics. Sometimes the proportions on 1x or 2x hooks in the smaller sizes, 16/18 on down, just don't look like they maximize your chances at getting the hook set. Lotta body in proportion to gape.
Pardon the ramble. Hopefully someone gets what I'm saying and can chime in if they've ever concluded much of anything on this. Thanks.
I lost some fish last year that I didn't think I should have, so naturally I decided to blame the hooks I used for a given size. That's to say, This year, instead of going down in hook gape (actual size), I'm going to go smaller on the shank first instead.
Example: If I currently tie a given nymph pattern in a 14 1x long shank and a 16 1x long shank, I'm now going to tie the 16 size on a 14 regular shank.
I've heard hook proportions talked about on here in terms of what creates a better hook set, but don't recall specifics. Sometimes the proportions on 1x or 2x hooks in the smaller sizes, 16/18 on down, just don't look like they maximize your chances at getting the hook set. Lotta body in proportion to gape.
Pardon the ramble. Hopefully someone gets what I'm saying and can chime in if they've ever concluded much of anything on this. Thanks.