lestrout wrote:
Not only have I kept some form of written record since I first started fishing (spinning for gills), for the last several decades, I carry a tape recorder on stream to record anything interesting, including the bird calls. My favorite sound is a screaming drag.
I then distill some of the info to an Excel spreadsheet, which I have macros on so that start and stop times automatically translate into hours consumed doing the act. I have columns for YTD and total time on lines, reels, and rods. Since I'm evaluating waders, I transfer time in use to a separate spreadsheet.
Yes - I also count trouts. I do this now more to track productivity (in terms of trouts landed) now rather than the raw total number. In this way I can decide on a given water (I ffish many different ones, as well as new ones) on a given time of season, what several hours might be the best time to hop in the water. I have a short attention span, so if I can't reasonably expect several trouts an hour, I have lots of other things I enjoy doing, such as smoking a pipe with my dog (he's not a smoker), reading in the sunlight, listening to the stream, doing Sudoku.
Since I ffish many dozens of rods and reels/lines, I rarely use the same combination - I keep another spreadsheet to track the combinations and often use it to select what rod/reel/line I will start off with on an outing.
For the fellow who felt every season's being different nullified the advantages of writing things down: I used to spreadsheet air and water temps with the Beaverkill to decide which 3 days I would go up there to hit the Hendricksons - since every year it was different. In the course of doing this, along with days of sun and water levels, I got pretty good at forecasting several weeks ahead when to show up. Now I do it intuitively, but the graphs I created and studied sped up my learning curve.
This doesn't take as much time as you think - taping on the stream is reflexive now, and the macros on the Excels take only several minutes for the input. It's good to reflect how the day went and what to improve and what to keep (not the trouts - the methods, fly patterns, etc.) Daily tracking of my investments takes longer, and that takes very little time .
Maurice - shame on you for not finding more productive water! In the days when numbers meant more to me, I actually found spots where I got up to 128 wild trouts in an especially productive morning (this is all on tape, rushing water and splashes and all). Actually, it's hard to remember how many you've caught when there are a lot of misses and LDR's and when you get past about 25 landed. Another reason to tape for me.
Now, when I get 3 or 4 trouts on a fly, I switch to see what else works. And after a couple of dozen trouts, unless the hatches are changing, I quit or go practice casting - once I've figured out what is working, a lot of the challenge is gone.
Last - another benefit to tracking, and therefore learning, is that I can help other folks who want to try out new water with pretty good advice - since I have a history on catch rates, hatches, etc.
Oh yah - I don't nymph. If I did, unless I was going for a big count, I would guess that a Zebra, Weenie, PT, Vurm, Stone, GRHE and honeybug would be about all you would need. And then what would I do with all that fly tying stuff? I think in that case I also wouldn't feel the need to keep much in the way of records. Besides, it's too hard.
tl
les