I can't verify from my friend's picture, but I'm pretty sure the man-made sediment path installed in the river stretches across the whole river. Even if it didn't, the primary path guides take during floats is through the center arch, which is completely blocked off. My big area of concern is how the sediment is going to be managed, and how they plan on removing the sediment path without impact. They can't just "let the sediment wash out" after they are done as it may permanently change the river's path/flow, and it will have impacts on aquatic life downstream of the construction (especially trout eggs and aquatic insect life). I filed a "potential complaint" report on the DEP website today to ensure they are doing their due diligence in checking on this project and their permit requirements, and another member messaged me that they are forwarding the concerns to the PAFBC regional office in the area.
Reporting back - Fantastic gentlemen from the DEP named John gave me a call back. The permitting process was conducted correctly and they abided by construction start dates on the permit to interfere as little as possible with trout spawning. The encroachment permit for the sediment fill was properly followed as well. He noted that the PAFBC may be taking a stop out there just to check on the activities and see if there is anything that needs addressed. Obviously this will have a small impact - but not anything notable IMO. Always good for us to check in on situations like this to bring things to light since the DEP has a lot to look after.
